PDA

View Full Version : Southern Africa's 'Bushmen' face lifestyle threat


MANGO!
10-16-2007, 12:28 PM
Southern Africa's 'Bushmen' face lifestyle threat
http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/6376/nmaimgex20042116266vivsix2.jpg
by Brigitte Weidlich
Mon Oct 15, 12:33 PM ET

TSUMKWE, Namibia (AFP (http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071015/wl_africa_afp/namibiasafricabushmensocialhistory)) - They roamed the savannahs and open plains for thousands of years, but the hunter-gatherer lifestyle of southern Africa's San tribes is slowly being squeezed towards extinction.

After clashing at the start of the last century with German settlers in modern-day Namibia and then being exploited by South Africa's apartheid regime in the 1980s, the San, also known as Bushmen, are now threatened by the 21st century curses of unemployment, poverty, alcohol abuse and HIV-AIDS. While the plight of the San in Botswana made headlines in recent months when authorities illegally evicted tribes from the Kalahari, their kinsmen in Namibia and South Africa have fared little better in protecting their traditional habitat.

A glimmer of hope lies in tourism as operators discover this remote part of Namibia where the likes of Gcao Nari, a grandmother of the Juhoansi San tribe, showcase the ancient art of threading ostrich shell beads. But in a sign of the times, the beads that Nari painstakingly needles under the fierce sun are imported from neighbouring South Africa since there are no ostriches left in the area of the remote northeastern Otjozondjupa region.

Nari speaks softly to her granddaughter in the ancient San tongue, with complicated clicks rolling from her lips as she enthuses about tentative plans to re-introduce game to the area as a source of food and income for a people with unparalleled hunting abilities. "Then my grandchildren can be taught to hunt again," she says. About 30,000 San remain in Namibia, with the Haikom and Juhoansi the largest groups.

Their numbers dived from the start of the last century when then colonial rulers Germany allowed growing numbers of white settlers to shoot Bushmen and encroach on their traditional hunting grounds. South Africa took over the territory's administration during the First World War until Namibia's independence in 1990, which followed a protracted liberation war.

Nari remembers the 1970s when the South African military came to enlist the help of the San in return for certain favours. "They used my husband and other men of our village as trackers along the border with Angola to fight freedom fighters," she says through an interpreter. "The military drilled boreholes for us and taught our children, their doctors in uniform gave us medical treatment and my husband earned a salary."

Other San like the Khwe and Vasekele originated in Angola, were employed by Portuguese colonial military forces during that country's liberation struggle, but fled to Namibia after Angolan independence in 1975. They were wedged between two warring factions.

The South African military gave them shelter in then South West Africa; the men became trackers and soldiers in a special 'Bushman Battalion' against the Peoples' Liberation Army of Namibia (PLAN).

In 1990, some 1,000 San soldiers and their families took up an offer from the Pretoria government to settle at Schmidtsdrift, near Kimberley in South Africa's arid Northern Cape province, fearing reprisals from the new Namibian government if they stayed.

The 5,000-strong !Xu -- an exclamation point precedes the word to represent the distinctive click sounds in their language -- and Khwe communities left in the Northern Cape today have been reduced to relying on government pensions and food handouts.

"I feel caged," says 84-year-old Monto Masako in his sparsely furnished three-roomed home at Platfontein, as he dreamily recalls his childhood. "My father taught me to hunt with a bow and arrow. We slept in the veld -- it was so free. But that has all been taken away, we can never go back."

The Schmidtsdrift community spent its first decade in an army tent camp, exposed to the elements and without proper services. But in 1999, then president Nelson Mandela handed them the title deeds to the nearby farm Platfontein, which they had bought by pooling nearly 900 individual government housing grants of 15,000 rand (2,000 dollars, 1,400 euros) each.

With further government and NGO help, houses were erected and the move from Schmidtsdrift started some three years later. But having put all their hopes on Platfontein for a better life, many were bitterly disappointed.

With a handful of available jobs and no public transport to the town of Kimberley some 10 kilometers (six miles) away, many spend their days idling and drinking. There is no refuse removal and the tiny homes are shoddily built, letting in the rain and wind. Nor is there any inside plumbing, bathroom or kitchen, while many units have yet to get electricity.

HIV, tuberculosis, crime and teenage pregnancy are on the rise, community workers say.

"We can never go back to the life of old, but at least a good quality house would have made it more tolerable," said Masako.

There is some cause for hope, however, with the new generation of San attending school and several employment projects in the pipeline. The people of Platfontein have set up a security company providing some 300 jobs, erected a cultural tourist centre, and were planning a game lodge with various donations. "We are trying to make a new life," said community leader Mario Mahongo.

MANGO!
10-16-2007, 12:38 PM
Whatever you do, don't call these people "black," apparently it is an insult. :weird:

Greetings to you

I have to make a few things clear in order to answer you.

1. The KHOISAN are not black

2. They are separate from other population

The KHOISAN people are not easy to classify due to outside elements that has been playing part in destroying our identity. We are brown; yellowish in colour even some are white. The are even some of us that are darker in colour, but we don’t classify ourselves as blacks. Why? The term black same as coloured has become an insult, because we are seen as not white and also not black we are seen as not part of the population in this country. I really get angry for those KHOISAN people who call themselves Coloureds and say they are even proud. I feel sorry for them because they do not know their culture and their heritage. I am ask a lot about why do I still wear that animal skin in front and I simply say its my culture. To answer you on are we black, the answer is no no no. You can call us brown but not black. The term black refers to the Nguni people, the Xhosas (name given by us), Zulus, and other black tribes. We are indigenous to this land so if we are labelled as blacks our Nguni people that are blacks and us would be on the same level(which we not). You see to call us blacks would be an insult, but sadly our people of KHOISAN descent because of poverty and for getting jobs in the new South- Africa they call themselves black( black economic empowerment ). The KHOISAN can never be seen as black nor can the be called black they are the true Africans because they are indigenous to this land. The outside areas (outside South-Africa) even Namibia there are KHOISAN, but to the overseas people there are two people in South-Africa blacks and whites (we need to tell them about the KHOISAN) I ask one tourist this question and his answer were that their knowledge about the KHOISAN are that they are rebellious and that they were animal skin. You see that is why I am proud to wear my traditional clothes for heritage day to show people that I am KHOISAN that is who I am. To finish the discussion we as the KHOISAN see ourselves as people not like the blacks, but separate from them and would not be seen or known like anything else

Hope this put some light on your questions

MANGO!
10-16-2007, 12:57 PM
http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/2227/capoidqs7.gif

According to Knight et al. (2003) Y-haplogroup A, the most diverse or oldest-diverging Y haplogroup transmitted purely by patrilineal descent, is today present in various Khoisan tribes at frequencies of 12-44%, and the other Y-haplogroups present have been formed by recent admixture of Bantu male lineages E3a (18-54%), and in some tribes, noticeable Pygmy traces are visible (B2b). The Khoisan also show the largest genetic diversity in matrilineally transmitted mtDNA of all human populations. Their original mtDNA haplogroups L1d and L1k are one of the oldest-diverging female lineages as well. However, analysis of neutral autosomal (inherited through either parent) genes finds that the Khoisan are similar to other sub-Saharan African populations.

The presence of Haplogroup A, especially the subclade A3b2, in East Africa suggests some ancient connection between those populations and the Khoisan. This may not be a simple migration in one direction, but the result of various movements of people in Eastern and Southern Africa over tens of thousands of years, followed by the recent Bantu expansion separating the two regions.

One interpretation is that the Khoisan are the earliest-diverging human group, or even a group that has preserved the original human lifestyle along with genetics. More conservatively, it can be said that the patrilineal or matrilineal descent of most individuals in most other human groups have passed through common genetic bottlenecks that are later than the most recent common patrilineal ancestor or most recent common matrilineal ancestor shared by all humans, and that the ancestors of the Khoisan avoided these particular bottlenecks. Such bottlenecks might be associated simply with the chance reproductive success of particular males, or with the settlement and subsequent expansion of a small group (e.g. modern humans venturing out of Africa, or the Sahara Pump Theory, or recovery from disasters like the Toba catastrophe) or have even more complex causes.

This does not show that the Khoisan were particularly isolated through history and prehistory; in fact, the autosomal genes demonstrate interchange with other African populations.

Zed
10-16-2007, 08:18 PM
With a handful of available jobs and no public transport to the town of Kimberley some 10 kilometers (six miles) away, many spend their days idling and drinking. There is no refuse removal and the tiny homes are shoddily built, letting in the rain and wind. Nor is there any inside plumbing, bathroom or kitchen, while many units have yet to get electricity.



So they've roamed the savannah for thousands of years, living under the stars and suddenly they can't live without public transportation , indoor toilets and all the mod cons? Why can't they walk the six miles to town ? It's not like they have anything better to do.

SteamshipTime
10-16-2007, 09:25 PM
This is an example of a people who should be either let alone to go native or go extinct as the case may be, or who should be enlisted in benevolent servitude.

The Retard
10-16-2007, 10:17 PM
So they've roamed the savannah for thousands of years, living under the stars and suddenly they can't live without public transportation , indoor toilets and all the mod cons? Why can't they walk the six miles to town ? It's not like they have anything better to do.

We seen this here with the American Indians. What happens is the younger generation is torn between two cultures - the modern and their traditional culture. The younger generation begins to gravitate toward the stronger culture because of modern conveniences and peer pressure to assimilate. They don't learn the techniques that helped their ancestor survive in the wild thousands of years.

This is an example of a people who should be either let alone to go native or go extinct as the case may be, or who should be enlisted in benevolent servitude.

I agree, and i think it's kind of cool they can survive in the wild and still retain their traditional methods, no matter how primitive. I wish we knew the methods of primitive Europeans. We can only look at these tribes and try to guess what we did back then. We can learn a lot from these tribes in that respect.

UberSwank
10-16-2007, 10:20 PM
This is an example of a people who should be either let alone to go native or go extinct as the case may be, or who should be enlisted in benevolent servitude.

No! They need to be helped... with your tax money! It's your burden as a white man.

SteamshipTime
10-16-2007, 10:21 PM
I don't think it's so sanguine as that. I think they lived as they did because they had to. Otherwise, their society would break down and they would starve. Remove the Malthusean checks, and the pathologies associated with low intelligence and limited ability for abstract thought which were there all along come to the fore.

Just a theory.