PDA

View Full Version : A Best Friend? You Must Be Kidding


The Libertine
06-22-2010, 02:57 AM
A Best Friend? You Must Be Kidding

FROM the time they met in kindergarten until they were 15, Robin Shreeves and her friend Penny were inseparable. They rode bikes, played kickball in the street, swam all summer long and listened to Andy Gibb, the Bay City Rollers and Shaun Cassidy on the stereo. When they were little, they liked Barbies; when they were bigger, they hung out at the roller rink on Friday nights. They told each other secrets like which boys they thought were cute, as best friends always do.

Today, Ms. Shreeves, of suburban Philadelphia, is the mother of two boys. Her 10-year-old has a best friend. In fact, he is the son of Ms. Shreeves’s own friend, Penny. But Ms. Shreeves’s younger son, 8, does not. His favorite playmate is a boy who was in his preschool class, but Ms. Shreeves says that the two don’t get together very often because scheduling play dates can be complicated; they usually have to be planned a week or more in advance. “He’ll say, ‘I wish I had someone I can always call,’ ” Ms. Shreeves said.

One might be tempted to feel some sympathy for the younger son. After all, from Tom Sawyer and Huck Finn to Harry Potter and Ron Weasley, the childhood “best friend” has long been romanticized in literature and pop culture — not to mention in the sentimental memories of countless adults.

But increasingly, some educators and other professionals who work with children are asking a question that might surprise their parents: Should a child really have a best friend?

Most children naturally seek close friends. In a survey of nearly 3,000 Americans ages 8 to 24 conducted last year by Harris Interactive, 94 percent said they had at least one close friend. But the classic best-friend bond — the two special pals who share secrets and exploits, who gravitate to each other on the playground and who head out the door together every day after school — signals potential trouble for school officials intent on discouraging anything that hints of exclusivity, in part because of concerns about cliques and bullying.

More at link...

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/17/fashion/17BFF.html?pagewanted=all

Do we have to wait for the whole country to be engulfed in civil unrest before we burn down all the schools, or can we start now?

Monster
06-22-2010, 03:14 AM
I didn't read the rest of the story. But based on what's here, I wonder if they're trying to supress the natural tendency to form best-friendships because best friends might naturally be two kids of the same race? And the cliques that grow from natural friending might tend to be similarly homogeneous? Just wondering.

The Libertine
06-22-2010, 03:58 AM
I didn't read the rest of the story. But based on what's here, I wonder if they're trying to supress the natural tendency to form best-friendships because best friends might naturally be two kids of the same race? And the cliques that grow from natural friending might tend to be similarly homogeneous? Just wondering.

Yes, but they never come out and say it. Race is only a part of it, they really think they can make everyone like each other.

Jake Featherston
06-22-2010, 06:46 AM
They're just launching an attack on friendship for the same reason they hate the family, or the church. Its a social relationship outside their locus of control.

Kriger
06-22-2010, 07:07 AM
Brave New World....

FIPS
06-23-2010, 02:10 AM
.

In the future (tomorrow) you will not be allowed to have a best friend that you can learn stuff from and plan with...until prison, where they no longer have the option of preventing it.

.