PDA

View Full Version : Will Ron Paul be assassinated ?


Hugh Jorgen
12-25-2007, 06:38 AM
ARE THE GLOBALISTS OUT TO GET RON PAUL? (http://www.newswithviews.com/Stang/alan21.htm)

by Alan Stang
December 24, 2007
NewsWithViews.com

Warning! As you know, I always give you my best jokes in these pieces. This one will contain no humor. Will the conspiracy for world government assassinate Dr. Paul? That is the stark question now before us. Since the Paul campaign started to take off, I have been hearing agonized comments to that effect from his supporters. So far, I have said nothing, hoping they would subside, but now comes an authentic reporter citing “reliable sources” from inside.

He is Daniel Estulin, an author who lives in Spain, and whose welcome, new exposé is The True Story of the Bilderberg Group (Walterville, OR, Trine Day, 2007). The Bilderbergers meet at least once a year. Somewhere in the world, they take over a five-star establishment, kick all the other guests out, surround the place with guards armed with machine guns and meet in secret, where they decide what will happen to you and your property, which you have not elected them to do.

Estulin apparently has a good record for accuracy. He says that sources in a think tank in U.S. intelligence tell him that people at the top of the U.S. government are considering the execution of Dr. Ron Paul, whose exploding popularity is causing them to fear they could lose control. Recently, he became the 18 Million Dollar Man, after people around the country raised more than $6 million for his campaign in one day, a gargantuan record.

Estulin told commentator Alex Jones: “I am getting information from my sources that there are people involved from a higher level of the American establishment who are seriously considering – this has not been confirmed – but assassination is definitely on the agenda and I pray to God that this is not the case.” Estulin says his source has been accurate for ten years, and says that if the “Ron Paul Revolution” continues to multiply, assassination could be a “serious option.”

Needless to say, the utterly genteel lunatics who operate at that height in Washington do not use words like “assassinate” or “execute.” Certainly, they would never breathe the word “kill,” a word that has hair on it. They talk about the possibility of “removing” Dr. Paul, who is perfectly aware that assassination is a favorite technique of the conspiracy for world government. “If you can’t lick ‘em, join ‘em,” becomes “If you can’t lick ‘em, kill ‘em,” in the lexicon of world government.

Andy Jackson opposed the National Bank and someone tried to shoot him in the Capitol Rotunda. President James Garfield talked too much about money backed by gold and was assassinated. Huey Long, the “Kingfish,” opposed serial killer Franklin Roosevelt. He too was assassinated. Arthur Bremer stepped out of a crowd with a handgun and crippled George Wallace. John Hinckley, Jr. stepped out of a crowd with a handgun and shot Ronald Reagan. Of course, these are just a few examples.

Later, we are told that most of the assassins are demented. Richard Lawrence, who tried to kill Andy, told interrogators he was Richard III. Hinckley said he tried to kill Reagan to win the love of actress Jodie Foster. No doubt Hinckley would have been disillusioned and maybe would not have done it had he known that Jodie Foster is a dyke. Often the perpetrators leave an incriminating diary behind.

In the Soviet Union (which regular readers know never did collapse) there are literal schools of assassination. They teach how to kill an enemy by running him down with a truck. Was that what happened to General Patton? They teach how to kill a man with cyanide. The killer walks past him with a rolled up newspaper under his arm. When they come abreast, he puts the newspaper to his lips like a funnel and blows cyanide crystals into the target’s face. The crystals do their job and dissipate. When the doctors examine the corpse, all they can determine is that he had a fatal heart attack.

Defenestration is another favorite technique. The target is simply thrown out a window, which in German is a “Fenster.” The Soviets did that in 1948 to Jan Masaryk, who stood in the way of their conquest of Czechoslovakia. That is what happened to Secretary of Defense James Forrestal who could have done much to stop the Reds. He “committed suicide” in 1949 by tying the sash of his robe around his neck and “jumping out” a 16th floor window of Bethesda Naval Hospital. Investigators found broken glass on his bed.

So it would be a very easy matter to assassinate Dr. No. His campaign threatens literally everything the conspiracy for world government is doing. Logic tells us that the conspirators will refuse to let one mild, avuncular doctor derail them when they are so close, which now becomes realistic to discuss. Ron loves to mix among his people. It would be very easy to inspire a nutbag who thinks he is Sitting Bull or Joan of Arc to step out of a crowd with a diary in one hand and a .38 in the other, and blow him away with his campaign.

Daniel Estulin says his sources tell him the “risk assessment” people at the top who are considering “removal” are asking each other, “What would happen if? . . . .” What would happen if Dr. No were “removed?” They are wise to ask. The fact that they are asking is an indication that they recognize something is different, something in the air. They are not sure what it is and it is making them nervous. I believe I can be helpful. I do know what would happen. There is something different.

I am talking now to some of my readers, to those men at the highest levels of government in Washington who are discussing the ramifications of the murder of Dr. Paul. I am talking to their factotums who would arrange it. You have successfully killed many men with impunity. I have mentioned a few. You killed Jack Kennedy who cooperated but was not really one of you; you killed Mike King when his exposure destroyed his usefulness. You killed and got away with it. The people grumbled – some even suspected – but they bought your explanations, however farcical.

It was a “lone gunman,” a wack job disconnected from everyone else, a guy with a diary proving how crazy he is, a guy with a mother problem, who can’t find a girl. I once asked Sara Jane Moore, convicted of trying to assassinate Gerald Ford, whether she had acted alone or in concert with others. She replied, “I have never answered that question, and I never will.” Not “I acted alone,” but “I never will answer.”

No more – no more – no more! Yes, you could easily take out Dr. Ron, but by doing so you would irrevocably change the rules and make it a new game. It’s too late. Too many of us know who you are. Too many of us know what you want and that you have names, addresses, phone numbers and faces. And you can’t put the toothpaste back in the tube.

You have seen the passion of his supporters. You yourselves call them fanatics and wackos. They are volunteers; they quit their jobs, go broke and work for free. They hitch rides across the country, high-five each other and sleep on the floor. They are consumed. This is what they live for. Ron doesn’t tell them what to do. They tell him.

Losing in a fair fight would be bitter, but because of their beliefs – and Dr. No’s benign influence – they would go home in peace. Losing unfairly – because you kill the candidate, proving he could win – after such enormous effort would be intolerable; in other words, they would not tolerate it. I can assure you; they would not let it pass.

Who are they? Remember the patriot campaigns of old, run by little, old ladies from Pasadena in tennis shoes, accompanied by little, old men with no expertise? You used to make fun of them. David Rockefeller used to joke that they didn’t have $5 to attend their own meetings. That too is gone, finished.

Dr. No’s people are also doctors, lawyers, engineers, etc. They are the people who make this country go. They are computer nerds. Dr. No enjoys a monopoly on the nation’s nerds, because they know he is the only candidate who advocates real freedom, the only one who would keep the internet free. All the others would acquiesce in the conspiracy’s desire to control it.

The nerds can hack into anything. They have successfully hacked outfits like DOD. If they can get into DOD, they can get into anywhere. You can’t keep them out. They can take your identity and ruin your credit. They can create a lien on your property and a debt of $8 million to I.R.S. They can shut you down. If you whack Dr. Paul, they are going to be mad. You are terrified, as well you should be, about what they might do.

Even worse, Dr. No has enormous support in the military, certainly more support than any other Republican, even more support than Arizona traitor John McClunk. What does that tell you? Did you happen to know that the .50 caliber rifle has a range of more than a mile? Do you know how far that is? It’s far enough so that by the time you find out where it came from, the sorehead who did it has another name and identity supplied by the nerds and is dancing the tango in Buenos Aires.

Remember, I’m not the guy you need to worry about. I’m too decrepit to hit a face with a pie. The guy you need to worry about is out there now, watching, stewing. By now, he is legion. He knows you are coming for his guns. And he is for instance the deadliest creature who ever stalked the earth: the Marine Corps sniper. Gunny maybe a little heavier, and a tad slower, but he is still fast enough to stick the red dot in your eye on his way to Buenos Aires.

But Dr. Paul would never do such a thing! You’re right, a man so meek and humane, so truly Christian, would not. But remember that Dr. No is the champion of the Constitution, and the Founding Fathers said they gave us the Second Amendment in case we need it to overthrow the government. Indeed, President Tom Jefferson urged us to rise in a bloody revolution every twenty years or so, just for the fun – for the principle – of it.

Consider also that you can whack Dr. Paul, yes, but you can’t kill his ideas. His ideas would still be there and so would these people who chose him. They would choose someone else who would probably be meaner. If you hit Dr. Paul, you well-paid flunkies who implement the schemes of the psychos at the top will always need to be looking for the red dot, because to do your jobs you must be out among the people.

The Ron Paul fanatics could even decide you are implicated in the hit just because you work for the federal government, maybe for I.R.S. or the Fed. Yes, that’s crazy, but, remember, they’re fanatics! They’re wackos! When you see the red dot, you could have time to hear a distant tap, maybe two. Those faint sounds will solve your problems here, but tomorrow morning you will wake up in Hell.

Unlike your flunkies, you psychos at the top do not mix among the people. You are surrounded by security. You just pick up the phone and give orders. We know that. Thank God it is impossible for Gunny to reach you. The only thing you need to worry about is cocktails on your balcony or sailing off the coast, or meeting in some five-star joint surrounded by machine guns, or eating dinner in a restaurant, or getting into a car or getting out of a car. Other than that, you have nothing to fear.

Needless to say, I pray daily that none of this happens. It won’t for sure if Dr. No survives the campaign intact.


© 2007 - Alan Stang - All Rights Reserved

Alan Stang was one of Mike Wallace’s original writers at Channel 13 in New York, where he wrote some of the scripts that sent Mike to CBS. Stang has been a radio talk show host himself. In Los Angeles, he went head to head nightly with Larry King, and, according to Arbitron, had almost twice as many listeners. He has been a foreign correspondent. He has written hundreds of feature magazine articles in national magazines and some fifteen books, for which he has won many awards, including a citation from the Pennsylvania House of Representatives for journalistic excellence. One of Stang’s exposés stopped a criminal attempt to seize control of New Mexico, where a gang seized a court house, held a judge hostage and killed a deputy. The scheme was close to success before Stang intervened. Another Stang exposé inspired major reforms in federal labor legislation.

His first book, It’s Very Simple: The True Story of Civil Rights, was an instant best-seller. His first novel, The Highest Virtue, set in the Russian Revolution, won smashing reviews and five stars, top rating, from the West Coast Review of Books, which gave five stars in only one per cent of its reviews.

Stang has lectured in every American state and around the world and has guested on many top shows, including CNN’s Cross Fire. Because he and his wife had the most kids in Santo Domingo, the Dominican Republic, where they lived at the time, the entire family was chosen to be actors in “Havana,” directed by Sydney Pollack and starring Robert Redford, the most expensive movie ever made (at the time). Alan Stang is the man in the ridiculous Harry Truman shirt with the pasted-down hair. He says they made him do it.

Website: AlanStang.com

E-Mail: stangfeedback@gmail.com

Pasdaran
12-25-2007, 06:42 AM
No,Ron will fail to win the primary and that'll be the end of the "Ron Paul revolution".

Jaybird
12-25-2007, 07:08 AM
If Paul gets elected or if they let it get that far, my fear is that he will be assassinated. They will blame it on "Islamofascist" terrorists.

apocales
12-25-2007, 08:08 AM
If Paul gets elected or if they let it get that far, my fear is that he will be assassinated. They will blame it on "Islamofascist" terrorists.

I have thought since he wants to reduce the federal government, maybe one of the agencies will go rogue on him.

Jake Featherston
12-25-2007, 08:29 AM
I do agree with the author that assassinating Ron Paul would radicalize his followers to such an extent that assassinations and "terrorist" bombings would likely occur in response. And since that's EXACTLY what the establishment would like patriotic White Americans to do, so that they could unleash their instruments of oppression on us like we were Taliban Jhadis hangin' out in Tikrit, I'm worried for Congressman Paul's safety. Its highly unlikely they'll shoot him in order to keep him from becoming President (for one thing, they probably won't need to), but its a great deal more likely they'll shoot him in order to generate a radicalized response which they can employ as a pretext for turning the USA into a full-blown, German/Soviet-style police state.

I'm actually surprised this possibility hadn't occurred to me before.

Jake Featherston
12-25-2007, 08:33 AM
Who the Hell is "Mike King," anyway? Wikipedia has an article for a "Michael King," who died in a single-car accident that some people apparently took to be mysterious in nature, but he was some sort of popular historian & biographer in New Zealand ie., not someone who would seem too likely an assassination target (nor someone likely to be mentioned in the same line as John F. Kennedy). Since he was a fellow Kiwi, I though might have some possible further knowledge.

Iconoclast
12-25-2007, 01:50 PM
I do agree with the author that assassinating Ron Paul would radicalize his followers to such an extent that assassinations and "terrorist" bombings would likely occur in response.I think such a response would be justified. Why should the System be allowed to wage war against the good people without the good people returning the favor? We should never resign ourselves to live at their mercy.

And since that's EXACTLY what the establishment would like patriotic White Americans to do, so that they could unleash their instruments of oppression on us like we were Taliban Jhadis hangin' out in Tikrit, I'm worried for Congressman Paul's safety. Its highly unlikely they'll shoot him in order to keep him from becoming President (for one thing, they probably won't need to), but its a great deal more likely they'll shoot him in order to generate a radicalized response which they can employ as a pretext for turning the USA into a full-blown, German/Soviet-style police state.Very well -- let them do so. If they toss out the rest of the Constitution, then it will be time to lay our cards on the table. We need to take the attitude that it's better to fight and possibly lose than to spend our lives in endless servitude.

If enough people (maybe 1-2% of the population, which is a LOT of people) were to resist tyranny via guerrilla warfare, the establishment wouldn't have a chance at maintaining a full-blown police state. They'd have to nuke and/or shell their own population centers, which of course would be suicidal: the deaths of so many innocents would radicalize the rest of the population, and the economy and infrastructure would suffer so much that the System couldn't continue to operate. Anarchy would result, and there'd no longer be a country left for them to rule over. Also, even many of the System's enforcers, along with their families and friends, live among the rest of the citizenry, so they're not going to be able to use indiscriminate force.

This is all hypothetical, of course. I sincerely hope that Dr. Paul lives to a ripe old age -- he deserves to.

Hugh Jorgen
12-25-2007, 02:04 PM
UJz81lAwY0M&eurl

t9epbfnyXdc&eurl

Deza0k30sb4&eurl

dDNUGPB6wfs&eurl

Zdmr5SFFjxc&eurl

hMvl99eWQ-I&eurl

Breckinridge Elkins
12-25-2007, 02:09 PM
Who the Hell is "Mike King," anyway? Wikipedia has an article for a "Michael King," who died in a single-car accident that some people apparently took to be mysterious in nature, but he was some sort of popular historian & biographer in New Zealand ie., not someone who would seem too likely an assassination target (nor someone likely to be mentioned in the same line as John F. Kennedy). Since he was a fellow Kiwi, I though might have some possible further knowledge.

Lol. Mike King is MLK's real name. He never legally changed it.

y'all are kooks, btw...

ZOG
12-25-2007, 06:52 PM
If Paul gets elected or if they let it get that far, my fear is that he will be assassinated. They will blame it on "Islamofascist" terrorists.

If he wins the primary or looks close to I predict attempts on his life anyway...

Or given his age perhaps poisoning ruled a stroke, heart attack etc ruled another kind of natural cause.

ZOG
12-25-2007, 08:34 PM
Given his opposition to central banking and the military-industrial complex, I suspect it's more likely than not. If he goes get killed, though, the Paul-ites will mourn for a while and that'll be it. There will be no guerrilla warfare within America: you got to be fucking kidding me.

As you said.

Iconoclast
12-26-2007, 02:48 PM
Given his opposition to central banking and the military-industrial complex, I suspect it's more likely than not. If he goes get killed, though, the Paul-ites will mourn for a while and that'll be it. There will be no guerrilla warfare within America: you got to be fucking kidding me.
I wouldn't be so sure. There are plenty of people who would go around killing the System's enforcers if given enough provocation. How many, I don't know. I do know that it wouldn't take many IRA imitators to do a hell of a lot of damage.

Okay, a Paul assassination might not be enough to set it off (unless it was obviously a murder sanctioned by the government), but enough overt political repression might do it -- if Americans have any balls, that is. The latter is admittedly questionable.

Breckinridge Elkins
12-26-2007, 03:05 PM
I've never seen such hardcore support for any candidate.

Seriously, we've got an army of desperate, paranoid Americans, here.

They've made an enormous committment in money, time and effort and if one hair on Ron Paul's head were touched, the other candidate's secret service details would have to be doubled.