PDA

View Full Version : Psychoanalysis of Phora/Stumble Inn Members


kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 05:02 AM
Due to pragmatic reasons, I'm only going to do myself and people I dislike. I will not analyze my allies for the point of keeping them allies.

kane123123 = Reactive personality with high threat perception and extreme defensive tendencies.

Ixabert = Anti-social personality disorder. Psychopath. Above average (but not high) intelligence combined with no remorse, viewing the rest of the world as dupes to take advantage of.

Ngrh8r = oppositional defiant disorder. troll.

Imperialiste = Borderline personality disorder. Wiling to do anything to be accepted.

Starr = Histrionic Personality Disorder http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histrionic_personality_disorder#Symptoms

Mike = Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. Can't get past the Jew issue.

Prak Stal = Borderline Personality Disorder. Views world in black and white and is willing to do anything to avoid rejection.

Featherston = Anti-social personality disorder but probably not a full psychopath. More likely just a sociopath.

DavidLynchMob
01-15-2008, 05:03 AM
What makes you think Prac has BPD?

I would disagree.

Imp probably does.

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 05:11 AM
Prak seems to be without conscience when it comes to using others to advance his own social status. But he walks on egg shells not to offend people of high social status. He has a strong desire to be accepted. He views the world in a very black and white manner.

DavidLynchMob
01-15-2008, 05:12 AM
Prak seems to be without conscience when it comes to using others to advance his own social status. But he walks on egg shells not to offend people of high social status. He has a strong desire to be accepted. He views the world in a very black and white manner.

When does he not offend people of high social status? Prac tries to offend everyone, doesnt he?

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 05:13 AM
I was requested to do overwatch.

My opinion is that Overwatch is just a clown. He strikes me as psychologically stable, but he seems to be a bit of a joker.

Blitzed
01-15-2008, 05:14 AM
kane123123 = Reactive personality with high threat perception and extreme defensive tendencies.That seems accurate. Jewish? Did you come up with this diagnosis on your own? Same latter question for the others.

DavidLynchMob
01-15-2008, 05:14 AM
Borderline personality disorder is very rare in the male population, btw.

ODD isn't a real disorder; it's a fake diagnosis to shift some of the burden imposed by the nigguh population in juvey to psych. facilities backed by public health insurance.

Are u down with ODD
Yeah you know me
Who down with ODD
Every last homey

DavidLynchMob
01-15-2008, 05:14 AM
I was requested to do overwatch.

My opinion is that Overwatch is just a clown. He strikes me as psychologically stable, but he seems to be a bit of a joker.

sicko-analyze me. use ur dad's textbookz

sugartits
01-15-2008, 05:16 AM
Borderline personality disorder is very rare in the male population, btw.


I've read that female psychopaths are often misdiagnosed as having borderline pd. This clearly means that Kane has a backwards self-diagnonsense.

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 05:17 AM
That seems accurate. Jewish? Did you come up with this diagnosis on your own? Same latter question for the others.
1/4 Jewish.

I came up with it when reading information relevant to criminal profiling, which showed the two profiles as opposites. A reactive personality is a person who goes very far to eliminate threats, like Josef Stalin. A psychopath would more resemble a con artist. Views their victim as a dupe who they can con and manipulate. A reactive personality views their opponents as threats, not as idiots to manipulate.

Blitzed
01-15-2008, 05:17 AM
sicko-analyze me.That's pretty fucking funny.

Blitzed
01-15-2008, 05:27 AM
Is it really Kane above or his dad? Or did you grow up a little, er, Kane, that is.

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 05:28 AM
I'm a more high brow poster than I've been given credit, especially lately. The fact that I am willing to flame assholes doesn't subtract from the fact that I can post intelligently when I'm not surrounded by assholes (the situation on the phora involved assholes).

harjit
01-15-2008, 05:29 AM
Prak seems to be without conscience when it comes to using others to advance his own social status. But he walks on egg shells not to offend people of high social status. He has a strong desire to be accepted. He views the world in a very black and white manner.

I agree with the black and white part. This trait is common in racialists and conservatives to begin with.

But he certainly doesn't seem like someone who has a need to be accepted, or overly cares about social status, or uses others.

Of course this is based on his persona on the boards. In reality Prac could well be a loud flamboyant big-boobed yenta sitting in Detroit for all we know.

Blitzed
01-15-2008, 05:30 AM
Looks like you're checking your spelling more. Do you use an aid?

DavidLynchMob
01-15-2008, 05:31 AM
I agree with the black and white part. This trait is common in racialists and conservatives to begin with.

But he certainly doesn't seem like someone who has a need to be accepted, or overly cares about social status, or uses others.

Of course this is based on his persona on the boards. In reality Prac could well be a loud flamboyant big-boobed yenta sitting in Detroit for all we know.

Deep down, harjit knows that everything the racists say are true...but he won't admit it.

Johnstein
01-15-2008, 05:35 AM
You once said I fit the psychological profile of a hacker.

Explain.

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 05:35 AM
Looks like you're checking your spelling more. Do you use an aid?
The only aid I use is what is built in. Red letters come up if I fuck up. Even without a spell check, I can still spell correctly. I simply avoid complex words and use substitutions.

Johnstein
01-15-2008, 05:35 AM
I agree with the black and white part. This trait is common in racialists and conservatives to begin with.

Are you trying to make a pun?

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 05:37 AM
You once said I fit the psychological profile of a hacker.

Explain.
You seem to be the typical fuck the world personality. You probably listen to death metal. You probably live a relatively non-socialized life, and are attracted to rebellious themes such as satanism. You probably have enough free times, due to your rejection of society, to experiment with your own projects to cause trouble. Hacking could be one of those projects.

DavidLynchMob
01-15-2008, 05:39 AM
You seem to be the typical fuck the world personality. You probably listen to death metal. You probably live a relatively non-socialized life, and are attracted to rebellious themes such as satanism. You probably have enough free times, due to your rejection of society, to experiment with your own projects to cause trouble. Hacking could be one of those projects.

Damn, nigga. Laying down the law.

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 05:45 AM
Machine in motion wants me to do thomas777.

I do think thomas is basically psychologically stable. I also think he's fairly loyal. He's so loyal, that at times he becomes naive. After being hurt, then he gets angry.

DavidLynchMob
01-15-2008, 05:46 AM
Machine in motion wants me to do thomas777.

I do think thomas is basically psychologically stable. I also think he's fairly loyal. He's so loyal, that at times he becomes naive. After being hurt, then he gets angry.

Do me, dammit.

:lmao:

1-800

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 05:49 AM
1-800 is psychologically stable. He does provoke people, but I don't think he does it out of any psychological compulsion. He has a tendency to troll for entertainment,but he's basically stable.

Mandalore
01-15-2008, 05:52 AM
I'd like to see this thread's title changed to "Oh, the irony".

Blitzed
01-15-2008, 06:07 AM
I agree with the black and white part. This trait is common in racialists and conservatives to begin with.

But he certainly doesn't seem like someone who has a need to be accepted, or overly cares about social status, or uses others.Black and white, yes. After all, the Corps trained Prac to kill and survive, which is about as B&W as it gets, true? Common in racialists and conservatives, agreed. I used to be a lot like Prac in that sense. Hardcore WN. There's still a lot of that in me. The Phoreign environment, however, has forced me to recognize that ideas and values are nothing if that cannot stand on their own when challenged. Consequently, my position on many matters is in a state of flux. They're being rehashed and refined. I believe a healthy society would be a lot like the Phora, or perhaps even fall out of or splinter off from a similar environment.

I agree with harj on the other Prac items. He doesn't use people, nor care about social status or need to be accepted. He is a man of integrity and loyalty to his conscience. If he believes you're wrong, friend or foe, he'll tell you so. Above all, to your face.

Hacking could be one of those projects.Hacking is by its very nature dishonest and subversive, and thus repulsive. It is thievery.

Deep down, harjit knows that everything the racists say are true...but he won't admit it.You're being way too hard on harj. We're a lot alike, but in reverse. That's why he's on the other side of the planet. ;)

Machine in Motion
01-15-2008, 06:08 AM
Ok Kane, analyze me - Hippias.

The Green Man
01-15-2008, 06:08 AM
I'm amazed you didn't diagnose anyone with delusions of grandeur.

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 06:08 AM
Due to pragmatic reasons, I'm only going to do myself and people I dislike. I will not analyze my allies for the point of keeping them allies.

kane123123 = Reactive personality with high threat perception and extreme defensive tendencies.

Ixabert = Anti-social personality disorder. Psychopath. Above average (but not high) intelligence combined with no remorse, viewing the rest of the world as dupes to take advantage of.

Ngrh8r = oppositional defiant disorder. troll.

Imperialiste = Borderline personality disorder. Wiling to do anything to be accepted.

Starr = Histrionic Personality Disorder http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histrionic_personality_disorder#Symptoms

Mike = Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. Can't get past the Jew issue.

Prak Stal = Borderline Personality Disorder. Views world in black and white and is willing to do anything to avoid rejection.

Featherston = Anti-social personality disorder but probably not a full psychopath. More likely just a sociopath.
Based on this I would make a good guard dog, ix would make a good serial killer, ngrh8r would make a good petty criminal, Imperialiste would play Oprah pretty well or some other drama queen show, Starr would make a good exhibitionist, Mike would make a good janitor, Prak Stal wouldn't be good at anything, and Featherston would make a good gang member.

sugartits
01-15-2008, 06:10 AM
does Featherston gots street cred?

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 06:13 AM
Ok Kane, analyze me - Hippias.
Hippias I don't know you too well. I haven't paid much attention, and you may not reveal a lot. Perhaps you are a person who doesn't trust others by showing your true personality.

Show me some neg reps and insults you got and maybe I can reach a conclusion.

Blitzed
01-15-2008, 06:18 AM
Okay, lay it on me Kane, and don't hold back.

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 06:22 AM
What is your phora name? You seem pretty stable at this point. But I didn't read you until today. You seem to take criticism well if you asked me to lay it on you. That is the mark of a sane person with a controlled ego.

Machine in Motion
01-15-2008, 06:26 AM
Hippias I don't know you too well. I haven't paid much attention, and you may not reveal a lot. Perhaps you are a person who doesn't trust others by showing your true personality.

Damn Kane, you read me like a book!

Blitzed
01-15-2008, 06:27 AM
Oh, sorry. Antiseptic, now Mr. Robinson. :weird:

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 06:29 AM
You seem a bit anal retentive but I don't think you have a personality disorder.

However, I am not having a problem with you, the way you are behaving today.

harjit
01-15-2008, 06:30 AM
Hey, long time no see! I hadn't realized stumbler was Kane.

Now I see why you're hard on Prac. You were talking about mutilating him over at MSF once, and you kept calling Starr "it". No offence but that period was damn funny :rofl:

Sorry that you had to be banned, the board was getting flooded with Kane-related material.

I hope you're not taking forum shit too seriously these days.

Blitzed
01-15-2008, 06:31 AM
1-800 is psychologically stable. He does provoke people, but I don't think he does it out of any psychological compulsion. He has a tendency to troll for entertainment,but he's basically stable.This is accurate. At first I thought he was an asshole, because he'd just start wailing on people in the SB. Finally gave him back some, and it just rolled off like water on a duck.

starr
01-15-2008, 06:33 AM
The histronic personality disorder doesn't fit me too well. A lot of those traits sound like somewhat common female traits taken to an extreme.
You probably fit some of these traits more so than me. when you posted on the Phora, your favorite subject seemed to be you and you would post in threads and bring the topic around to where it was about you. you also had a completely hissy fit when people questioned you on your ethnic origins,etc.
this is definitely attention seeking behavior.

Personality disorder test:

http://www.4degreez.com/misc/personality_disorder_test.mv

My issues.:snapjew:

Paranoid: Very High
Schizoid: Moderate
Schizotypal: Low
Antisocial: High
Borderline: Low
Histrionic: Moderate
Narcissistic: Very High
Avoidant: Moderate
Dependent: Low
Obsessive-Compulsive: Low

Blitzed
01-15-2008, 06:34 AM
You seem a bit anal retentive...You're all over it, I'm a fucking accountant. I have to be.

Batting 1,000. Change your major. :rockout:

(Most importantly, you nailed yourself...or something like that.) :D

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 06:49 AM
Paranoid: High
Schizoid: Moderate
Schizotypal: Low
Antisocial: High
Borderline: Low
Histrionic: Low
Narcissistic: Moderate
Avoidant: Low
Dependent: Low
Obsessive-Compulsive: Low
Edit, after reviewing, I'm convinced I am neither a psychopath nor a sociopath.

The paranoid fits right into my defensive personality.

sugartits
01-15-2008, 06:50 AM
The histronic personality disorder doesn't fit me too well. A lot of those traits sound like somewhat common female traits taken to an extreme.



Yeah yes. It should be renamed Obsessive Cuntpulsive Disorder or, for something a little more PC, Herstrionic.

sugartits
01-15-2008, 06:54 AM
diagnose Kermit the Frog.

Ugyrm4JU_8M

hpiIWMWWVco

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 06:54 AM
If you look at the 4 divisions of serial killers :
Visionary = hears voices in head
Missionary = wants to eliminate people they view as bad
hedonist = kills for fun or lust
power/control = wants to torture victims in a detailed fantasy

I of course am not a serial killer, but I have a missionary motive. I attack people I consider to be morally deserving, and I spare people who I consider to be morally decent.

The Green Man
01-15-2008, 06:55 AM
http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b199/Stormfronter/freud.jpg

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 07:15 AM
An important thing with these test is that the self-serving bias is present as you answer the questions. What people who know you well say about you is probably more accurate than what you are willing to admit about yourself.

starr
01-15-2008, 07:19 AM
I don't think I'm anti-social because of psychopathic reasons. Its more for reactive reasons. So I'm a sociopath, but not a psychopath. Able to break the rules, but not incapable of forming alliances.

As my link even says, the anti social personality disorder has nothing to do with social ineptness. Psychopaths learn to mimic emotions they do not have and can even be very charismatic and "likeable."

The anti social personality disorder sounds like nothing more than an extremely selfish person who will do whatever it takes to benefit or satistify themselves. There is a bit of a psychopath in all of us. These kinds of traits today are going to be even more prominent in people due to the kind of society we live in where everything revolves around the individual and his/her personal needs and wants. They are very manipulative, which would mean they are likely going to be very good in social relations.

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 07:22 AM
But I'm capable of not mimicking them and genuinely dividing people into good and bad. A psychopath is incapable of that.

Edit : After further review, I'm determined I'm neither a psychopath or a sociopath. A "moral missionary" would be a better description.

Blitzed
01-15-2008, 07:53 AM
An important thing with these test is that the self-serving bias is present as you answer the questions. What people who know you well say about you is probably more accurate than what you are willing to admit about yourself.True. That's why IR's humor is so funny and, if you're on the receiving end, so RaZoR sharp. (Might just walk in here and blow this thread all to Hell.)

If you look at the 4 divisions of serial killers :
Visionary = hears voices in head
Missionary = wants to eliminate people they view as bad
hedonist = kills for fun or lust
power/control = wants to torture victims in a detailed fantasy

I of course am not a serial killer, but I have a missionary motive. I attack people I consider to be morally deserving, and I spare people who I consider to be morally decent.You owned up to one of the four, but glossed over another. You do remember, right? A momentary fantasy of feigning the release of hostages, and then killing them anyway, however fictional it seemed to you (later) sounds a lot like "kills for fun or lust." So that's two out of four. The profile you posted earlier indicates you're trending toward schizophrenia. (Not beating you up here, just making a point.) So, maybe you haven't yet also wanted "to torture victims in a detailed fantasy" or yet also heard any voices in your head, but hear me on this:

If you keep dwelling on revenge and other negative, psychotic thoughts, my guess is the fantasies and voices will come. What do you think? You've demonstrated that you could really make something of yourself. Purge the negative junk ASAP. It's not helpful. In fact it's dangerous.

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 07:59 AM
I wouldn't take that into actual action. I may have a thrill motive. I probably also have a power/control motive to a lesser degree.

But the most powerful motive I have is the missionary motive. It is so strong that it overrides every other motive. For that reason I always spare the innocent.

starr
01-15-2008, 08:16 AM
delusions of grandeur are suggested in many of your posts, as well.

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 08:18 AM
They aren't delusions because I can back it up. When I say I outsmarted you, its a fact. You lost.

I don't have delusions or depression. My self-image is based on my merit. I am confident in areas I am good at and lack confidence in areas I am not good at. To be delusional means to overestimate one's abilities and I clearly don't.

I also have good control over my ego. I don't have an ixabert style ego.

Thaumiel
01-15-2008, 08:38 AM
I'm fairly convinced that I'm a reactive sociopath and not a psychopath
You're a sociopath?

starr
01-15-2008, 08:39 AM
The graniose way in which you look at things and how you relate to these things is what is suggestive of this, not how many debates you win or don't win or how smart (you think) you are.

They aren't delusions because I can back it up.

A person with delusions of grandeur would never say anything else.

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 08:44 AM
Again, and this is what has frustrated me throughout your whole phora run (and Helios too), you make statements and provide no evidence. You are the one who's delusional here, not to project. I've provided evidence, and you have not. I cited in a time in which my confidence was backed up. You have yet to show a time in which I claimed supremacy, and didn't have the goods to follow

starr
01-15-2008, 08:50 AM
Your "evidence" is your word. You believe this to be good enough because you have delusions of grandeur. My evidence is the way in which you speak and look at yourself.

In this very thread, alone, you are trying to convince us of what a great sociopath you are.:lmao:

Blitzed
01-15-2008, 08:50 AM
This is the point where a gentleman apologizes to Starr. Don't have to say for what, everybody already knows what for, e.g.:

"Starr, I apologize."

The sun will still rise today.

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 08:54 AM
Starr, every documentation shows you fell for the trap. That is evidence that I succeeded,and you failed to detect it. Its not a delusion. Denying it is a delusion. Like I said, you fit the personality type I original assigned to you, which has a symptom of spouting viewpoints without evidence to ground them. By your definition, someone who adequately achieves a goal and realizes it has a delusion. This is not a delusion. Its confidence grounded in evidence.

It would be a delusion if I overestimated my abilities. Your "evidence" has nothing to do with whether or not I am right, but is solely relevant to your own emotions.

Thaumiel
01-15-2008, 09:00 AM
Starr Hack 2: The Wrath of Kane. Why she's the target of your aggression I have no idea.

starr
01-15-2008, 09:00 AM
you are not getting what I am talking about here. I am not talking about anything you have done, or any debates you have "won",etc,etc. I am talking about your speaking style, which tends towards the dramatic and is also suggestive of you having a very high opinion of yourself, morally as well as otherwise. For example, this phrase:

But the most powerful motive I have is the missionary motive. It is so strong that it overrides every other motive. For that reason I always spare the innocent.

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 09:03 AM
It's entirely true. I do distinguish between good and bad, and I do treat the bad group different from the good group. I'm very robust and precise about doing this.

BTW, other people such as Daniel Shayes agree that I have this personality trait, and they agreed that Ixabert doesn't.

The Green Man
01-15-2008, 09:03 AM
Kane, if someone accuses you of having delusions of grandeur because you think of yourself as some superior being due to having won a minor Internet pissing contest, the point isn't that you didn't win the pissing contest, it's that you attach far too much importance to it (and by implication to yourself).

Anyway, who wants to analyse this:

You should not have acted against me. You see what I can do to you? I am more powerful, more clever, and more potent than you. I can make anyone believe anything I want

I admit my own guilt. I fact, I admit that I was responsible for much of the mayhem. I fact, you could not have even conceived such a plan without me. I am your superior, and you needed me. Now I am done with you, and you will pay.

:ix:

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 09:06 AM
What did Ixabert do technologically?

I fully admit that Ixabert has better linguistic skills than me. A person who is delusional would not be able to admit this. But when it comes to technical skills, yes, it was me that carried his weight. If I have to apologize for everything good I do to lower myself to make you happy, then that isn't really delusions of grander, its just jealousness. It may be more accurate to say that I am cruel (to people who deserve it) than I have delusions, because it would actually be grounded in evidence.

I know my own strengths and weaknesses and I am assertive. But I reject the label that I have delusions of grander. There are plenty of times I have also admitted weakness. My ego is extremely controlled.

starr
01-15-2008, 09:17 AM
And there is another thing right there suggestive of some kind of issue. You start a thread where you are psychoanalyzing people. The thread could have just been very lighthearted, even funny, but you took it personally, just like you took me jokingly questioning your jewish heritage seriously and blew it way out of proportion, which then caused you to classify me, who was always nice to you, as an "enemy." WAY over dramatic. These are ONLY Internet forums, you take them way too seriously.

I am getting bored with all of this now.

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 09:23 AM
To have delusions of grander means to have a frame of mind in which you don't attempt to realistically analyze yourself and instead believe whatever you want to believe. That's clearly not me. I was credited by a JTF admin as being extremely rational and logical, and at one point told that I should be a model for the behavior of other posters.

So now you say I blow stuff out of proportion. The reason I "blow stuff out of proportion" is because I don't have "delusions of grander." I value evidence over bullshit, and when I see bullshit, I challenge it.

You have a habit of this. Take a thread off topic, and then blame the other person. I can see why I saw Ix as an ally with you. Because you are even more ridiculous.

starr
01-15-2008, 09:31 AM
I did not take this thread off topic. the title of the thread is "psychoanalysis of Phora/Stumble Inn members" You post on this forum. An attempted psychoanalysis of you is perfectly on topic.

why would you see anyone on the net that you do not personally know as allies or enemies? What epic battles are you involved in on the net? again more grandiose speaking patterns.

The Green Man
01-15-2008, 09:33 AM
Kane,

You can't spell "delusions of grandeur" without u.

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 09:35 AM
The internet is a just a form of media. It is connecting real people. And I make judgments and classify people based on my experiences with them.

You expressed regret about how the thread "could have been" but you were the one who set the thread in this direction. I noticed you do the same thing on the phora at the time I was there a couple times, especially on the Jew issue.

Hugh Jorgen
01-15-2008, 10:00 AM
Yo Mr. 123123 - whatz yer take on Julian Lee, closet wanker, extraordinaire?

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 10:12 AM
Julian Lee is eccentric. He is socially awkward and obsessed with sex. Because of this, he probably has a fairly avoidant personality. What I mean is that his odd behaviors probably cause him to mix with few social circles. His isolation probably causes him to fantasize even more, thus creating more odd behaviors in a snowball effect. Just my guess.

harjit
01-15-2008, 10:20 AM
Starr Hack 2: The Wrath of Kane. Why she's the target of your aggression I have no idea.

One of:

1. Unrequited love.

2. Like a little boy lashing out at his mom.

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 10:47 AM
Or how about the fact that Starr doesn't debate using proper deductive reasoning techniques. She completely ignores evidence and simply believes whatever she wants, whether on Jews, or Personality Disorders.

The only reason others don't point out Starr's logical flaws is that they are going soft on her. If Starr argued at the male capability level, I would have no problem. It's not that she is female, it's that she debates poorly.

leopoldbloom
01-15-2008, 10:49 AM
Psychoanalyze me. And don't give me that "I don't know anything about you" crap, because we all know that isn't true.

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 11:02 AM
Leopoldbloom, I don't mean this in an offensive way of course, but you don't come off to me as having much personality. You are very efficient and you get quickly to the point. This is a quality I wish more women would have. Perhaps you are a very goal-oriented person. You are more concerned with the destination than the journey. Perhaps you live a busy lifestyle and feel you don't have time for inefficient behavior.

MANGO!
01-15-2008, 11:14 AM
http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/9868/lucykr2.jpg

Kane refers to himself in plural and third person, using overly monarchial language to describe meaningless internet drama. I don't believe it is an accurate representation of his true self at all. It is an image of his ideal self which he strives to project to others. That sort of extreme narcissism is an over-compensation for some fundamental flaw seen in oneself. The flaw is usually either completely imagined or imparted by some mentally traumatic experiences in early life. Kane probably did not receive enough praise as a child. In this late stage of his development he discovered his way of attaining praise: to situate himself online among his "peers" - people who; though of various ages and backgrounds; are neither too far beneath him nor too far above him - and impress them with his intellectual and technical abilities. He and the other Lyceum characters were drawn to one another on the basis of their wounded, hyperinflated egos and a shared goal of being perceived as part of an intellectual upper echelon among online fringe politics. Though I've chosen to analyse Kane this diagnosis can apply to Fade as well.

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 11:42 AM
Kane refers to himself in plural and third person, using overly monarchial language to describe meaningless internet drama. I don't believe it is an accurate representation of his true self at all. It is an image of his ideal self which he strives to project to others.
Well my real name of course isn't "kane." But I rarely call myself "Daryl" in real life, unless I am mocking someone. I use pronouns, as is normal.

That sort of extreme narcissism is an over-compensation for some fundamental flaw seen in oneself. The flaw is usually either completely imagined or imparted by some mentally traumatic experiences in early life. Kane probably did not receive enough praise as a child.
I was both loved and hated in school. I was routinely fighting other people, physically until high school, and verbally in high school. But I had friends too. People saw me as having charisma. But few people really got to know me. I kept a barrier between myself and everyone else. Perhaps it was from all the turbulent experiences I had growing up. These experiences were only verbal with my family, but were physical outside my family.


In this late stage of his development he discovered his way of attaining praise: to situate himself online among his "peers" - people who; though of various ages and backgrounds; are neither too far beneath him nor too far above him - and impress them with his intellectual and technical abilities.
Perhaps this is true. Another thing is that I am an IFS major so I use the computer anyways.

He and the other Lyceum characters were drawn to one another on the basis of their wounded, hyperinflated egos and a shared goal of being perceived as part of an intellectual upper echelon among online fringe politics. Though I've chosen to analyse Kane this diagnosis can apply to Fade as well.
I signed up for the lyceum basically as a contract killer (metaphorically). I didn't care why they wanted me, I just wanted revenge.

Alison
01-15-2008, 11:48 AM
A contract killer? Serious?

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 11:52 AM
Think metaphorically.

The Green Man
01-15-2008, 11:54 AM
Kane,

The Green Man thinks you should give some serious thought to serializing your upcoming autobiography and posting it one chapter per week in a thread here. It would be a real next-page-clicker.

Alison
01-15-2008, 12:03 PM
I agree!

leopoldbloom
01-15-2008, 12:14 PM
Leopoldbloom, I don't mean this in an offensive way of course, but you don't come off to me as having much personality. You are very efficient and you get quickly to the point. This is a quality I wish more women would have. Perhaps you are a very goal-oriented person. You are more concerned with the destination than the journey. Perhaps you live a busy lifestyle and feel you don't have time for inefficient behavior.

My purpose here was to discover how much someone can really find about me when they have had access to my personal accounts. Anyway, good shot. I don't live a very busy lifestyle, and do have time for quite a bit of inefficient behavior. But I don't like talking, and generally try to say as much as I can while saying as little as possible. This, of course, does not cut to the heart of the matter, as the real issue at hand, as with that of everyone, is one which I cannot articulate and likely am entirely unable to address of my own volition. Every analyst must learn to recognize the difference between the rejection (on the part of the analysand) of an analysis due to its innaccuracy and the rejection of an analysis due to its accuracy. Freud famously failed to do so in his case history of Dora.

Helena
01-15-2008, 03:25 PM
That read a little like the female Helios ^^

Do me Kane!

O'Zebedee
01-15-2008, 03:36 PM
Do me Kane!

Your feminine wiles won't work here - haven't you heard? He's sworn off sex!

Helena
01-15-2008, 03:40 PM
I meant Psychoanlayse me. :shock:

O'Zebedee
01-15-2008, 03:42 PM
Is there a subconscious pining for Freddie Mercury to be found in that post?

Let's psychoanalyze that.

The Green Man
01-15-2008, 03:43 PM
Is there a subconscious pining for Freddie Mercury to be found in that post?

Let's psychoanalyze that.
Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, mein freund.

Breckinridge Elkins
01-15-2008, 03:45 PM
Is there a subconscious pining for Freddie Mercury to be found in that post?

Let's psychoanalyze that.

Well Aurora is a British Jewess? with a penchant for swarthy, mustached men.

Quite obviously her mother was frightened by a wolverine.

Wait, is that Freud?

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 03:48 PM
I want to say i revised my posts. I don't think I am a sociopath after further study. A psychopath and a sociopath are two different things but I am neither. I can best be described as what I call a "moral missionary." The difference is sociopath forms alliances, real alliances, with other sociopaths, and a psychopath does not, they only fake them. I am neither.

As for aurora, I think she's fairly innocent. She probably had a fairly good upbringing with a stable family. She seems to be trusting. She should probably learn not to be because people will take advantage of it.

The Green Man
01-15-2008, 03:50 PM
I don't think I am a sociopath after further study. A psychopath and a sociopath are two different things but I am neither.
That's just what a psychopath would say!

Mandalore
01-15-2008, 03:57 PM
It's like he just can't resist telling us just how pitiful his existence really is.

Kane, you are clearly not a sociopath. You lack the ability to be truly manipulative because your intelligence is mediocre at best, your social skills are nearly non-existent and your command of the English language leaves much to be desired.

You lack all of the positive traits associated with a sociopathic personality, leaving you as nothing more than a selfish, dishonest, disloyal creep who has violence in his heart, but is prevented from acting on his criminal urges only by extreme cowardice.


Think about it:
You're ugly. You're stupid. You're mean and selfish.
Your parents are deeply ashamed of you. You have no friends. You couldn't even get laid in prison. Everybody hates you. There is nothing to live for.

Why don't you just end it all now? Hanging yourself sounds like a good bet. Build a little gallows in your basement and tie yourself a noose. I'm sure your parents won't pay any mind. They'll just think it's yet another of your bizarre masturbation rituals.

Winston
01-15-2008, 04:01 PM
I agree with the black and white part. This trait is common in racialists and conservatives to begin with.


I laugh every time you say this. That is clearly more of a liberal trait. That together with a complete lack of foresight.

As for kane, he's clearly some sort of obsessive-compulsive narcissist, incapable of introspection and prone to delusions of grandeur.
Even if I hadn't seen Kane before I'd be able to come to this conclusion from his posts in this thread alone.
Kane, you only offered your (inaccurate) analysis of the other people so you could talk about yourself. Admit it.

I'm still trying to work out why he's fixated his hate onto Starr. I believe it is related to his repressed homosexuality and hatred for woman.

Alison
01-15-2008, 04:01 PM
FFS! in response to ngrh8r

Jake Featherston
01-15-2008, 04:05 PM
does Featherston gots street cred?

The word out on the street is that I'm just bully.

Alison
01-15-2008, 04:07 PM
Bully? You? You're a softie sweetiepie.

Jake Featherston
01-15-2008, 04:07 PM
You're a sociopath?

He's gonna join my gang.

Jake Featherston
01-15-2008, 04:08 PM
Starr Hack 2: The Wrath of Kane. Why she's the target of your aggression I have no idea.

She makes him ashamed of his homosexuality.

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 04:09 PM
I laugh every time you say this. That is clearly more of a liberal trait. That together with a complete lack of foresight.

As for kane, he's clearly some sort of obsessive-compulsive narcissist, incapable of introspection and prone to delusions of grandeur.
Even if I hadn't seen Kane before I'd be able to come to this conclusion from his posts in this thread alone.
Kane, you only offered your (inaccurate) analysis of the other people so you could talk about yourself. Admit it.

I'm still trying to work out why he's fixated his hate onto Starr. I believe it is related to his repressed homosexuality and hatred for woman.
To the contrary, I am EXTREMELY introspective. I am so introspective that people tell me to stop it.

The rest isn't worth responding to.

Did you ever think that I'm maybe opposed to Starr because she has extremely poor deductive reasoning techniques?

Jake Featherston
01-15-2008, 04:12 PM
I see Kane read two-and-a-half chapters out of his older sister's Psych 101 textbook from 1997 and now thinks he's an expert in psychology.

Fascinating.

Winston
01-15-2008, 04:13 PM
Did you ever think that I'm maybe opposed to Starr because she has extremely poor deductive reasoning techniques?

Funnily enough, but that was the reason why I spent so much time mocking you in the shoutbox.

Mandalore
01-15-2008, 04:17 PM
Starr is attractive, intelligent and good natured.

It's only natural for someone like Kane to resent that.

Jake Featherston
01-15-2008, 04:20 PM
Bully? You? You're a softie sweetiepie.


"Bully" is a slang term from about a century ago, that basically meant "cool." Theodore Roosevelt used to use it a lot. NOBODY is "bully," anymore.

Jake Featherston
01-15-2008, 04:20 PM
Did you ever think that I'm maybe opposed to Starr because she has extremely poor deductive reasoning techniques?

No, quite frankly, that contingency had never occurred to me.

Alison
01-15-2008, 04:23 PM
"Bully" is a slang term from about a century ago, that basically meant "cool." Theodore Roosevelt used to use it a lot. NOBODY is "bully," anymore.

Aah, in that case, I agree. You are so supercool that if I had to splash water on you, you'd sizzle. :)

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 04:23 PM
She is actually not as attractive as you think she is. If you saw her picture where she is not using dim lighting, and blurry pictures, you would be surprised.

Alison
01-15-2008, 04:25 PM
She is actually not as attractive as you think she is. If you saw her picture where she is not using dim lighting, and blurry pictures, you would be surprised.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and beauty is skin deep. Starr comes across, from my perspective, as highly intelligent and immensely beautiful. I have not seen a picture of her.

Jake Featherston
01-15-2008, 04:26 PM
She is actually not as attractive as you think she is. If you saw her picture where she is not using dim lighting, and blurry pictures, you would be surprised.

If we too were using porn as our baseline by which to measure female beauty, that is.

O'Zebedee
01-15-2008, 04:33 PM
I know you're a hot stud that can turn away the chicks at will, but you might gain a bit more sympathy here if you didn't run down down a well liked female poster, Kane.

Just sayin', is all.

Vasily Zaitsev
01-15-2008, 05:15 PM
Kane-

Please, step away from the computer, leave the basement (or dorm, bedroom, home office, etc), and meaningfully interact with people in a fashion that is not mediated by communications technology. A large dose of real life will do you good. You'll likely respond to this with something along the lines of "I have a life--a very fulfilling life, actually."

Well I call bullshit. Nobody involved in significant goings on offline would be capable of attaching such significance to (un)life online. A person invested in life in the world would not be prone to using melodramatic language to describe the doings of internet fora nor would they be inclined to put so much time and effort into perpetuating the feuds that can arise on them. It's pathetic, Kane. Thinking any of this is of any consequence or that you can know people well enough through some posts to diagnose them with major psychological illnesses is indicative of a total loss of perspective.

The people you're attempting to diagnose may or may not be sick. The fact is that none of us know them well enough to say. Instead of playing online shrink you should take a look at your role in the beginnings of this forum drama. I understand that you think Jake, Prac, etc made fun of you. And if you attach too much significance to the internet that can be hurtful. But did they do this because they're sociopaths or did they do this because you were making an ass of yourself in a very public fashion? As an outside observer (y'know, the sort of person you said earlier in the thread who is more likely to accurately assess an individual's actions) I can't help but think the latter choice is correct. And if it is, you need to ask yourself whether or not you're continuing to do so. If you're as introspective as you claim, the answer should be obvious.

Alison
01-15-2008, 05:19 PM
I sincerely hope, for Kane's credibility, that he analyses me as a complete and utter nutjob. For that, I will pos rep every post he has ever made. Seeriass.

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 05:20 PM
Kane-

Please, step away from the computer, leave the basement (or dorm, bedroom, home office, etc), and meaningfully interact with people in a fashion that is not mediated by communications technology. A large dose of real life will do you good. You'll likely respond to this with something along the lines of "I have a life--a very fulfilling life, actually."

Well I call bullshit. Nobody involved in significant goings on offline would be capable of attaching such significance to (un)life online. A person invested in life in the world would not be prone to using melodramatic language to describe the doings of internet fora nor would they be inclined to put so much time and effort into perpetuating the feuds that can arise on them. It's pathetic, Kane. Thinking any of this is of any consequence or that you can know people well enough through some posts to diagnose them with major psychological illnesses is indicative of a total loss of perspective.

The people you're attempting to diagnose may or may not be sick. The fact is that none of us know them well enough to say. Instead of playing online shrink you should take a look at your role in the beginnings of this forum drama. I understand that you think Jake, Prac, etc made fun of you. And if you attach too much significance to the internet that can be hurtful. But did they do this because they're sociopaths or did they do this because you were making an ass of yourself in a very public fashion? As an outside observer (y'know, the sort of person you said earlier in the thread who is more likely to accurately assess an individual's actions) I can't help but think the latter choice is correct. And if it is, you need to ask yourself whether or not you're continuing to do so. If you're as introspective as you claim, the answer should be obvious.
I can tell I really had a strong opening post when I get a whiney bitchy reaction like this.

Vasily Zaitsev
01-15-2008, 05:32 PM
I can tell I really had a strong opening post when I get a whiney bitchy reaction like this.

Kane, I'm trying to be a nice guy about this.

Your opening post wasn't "strong" in that it was an accurate assessment of the posters you were "analyzing." Instead, it was strongly indicative of impotent resentment. It was pathetic.

I'm trying to save you further embarrassment. You've become the butt of all kinds of jokes in this circle of fora and every time you call attention to your sad little simulacrum of a life you serve only to shred your already tattered dignity a little more.

Within a minute of submitting my first post to this thread I received a message from another member telling me that this sort of approach will not work with you. I'm going to heed his counsel and not offer you any more advice. But, please, just try to keep all of this nonsense in perspective.

Phantasm
01-15-2008, 05:40 PM
http://www.4degreez.com/misc/personality_disorder_test.mv

My Profile: :lmao:


Paranoid: Very High
Schizoid: Moderate
Schizotypal: Low
Antisocial: High
Borderline: Low
Histrionic: Moderate
Narcissistic: Very High
Avoidant: Low
Dependent: Low
Obsessive-Compulsive: High

apocales
01-15-2008, 05:55 PM
Paranoid: Low
Schizoid: Moderate
Schizotypal: Moderate
Antisocial: Low
Borderline: Low
Histrionic: Low
Narcissistic: Moderate
Avoidant: Low
Dependent: Low
Obsessive-Compulsive: Moderate



:(

88mmFlaK
01-15-2008, 05:59 PM
Mine

Disorder | Rating
Paranoid: Moderate
Schizoid: High
Schizotypal: Low
Antisocial: Low
Borderline: Low
Histrionic: Low
Narcissistic: Moderate
Avoidant: Low
Dependent: Low
Obsessive-Compulsive: Low

Alison
01-15-2008, 06:00 PM
Disorder Rating Information
Paranoid: Low click for info
Schizoid: Low click for info
Schizotypal: Moderate click for info
Antisocial: Low click for info
Borderline: Low click for info
Histrionic: Low click for info
Narcissistic: Low click for info
Avoidant: Low click for info
Dependent: Low click for info
Obsessive-Compulsive: Low click for info

88mmFlaK
01-15-2008, 06:02 PM
Disorder Rating Information
Paranoid: Low click for info
Schizoid: Low click for info
Schizotypal: Moderate click for info
Antisocial: Low click for info
Borderline: Low click for info
Histrionic: Low click for info
Narcissistic: Low click for info
Avoidant: Low click for info
Dependent: Low click for info
Obsessive-Compulsive: Low click for info

Well aren't you just the paragon (almost) of mental health? :p

Alison
01-15-2008, 06:06 PM
Well aren't you just the paragon (almost) of mental health? :p

Hey, I am slightly Schizo, so don't mess with me, or I may have to bake you cookies or something. :)


What is Schizotypal Personality Disorder?
Quick Summary:
Many believe that schizotypal personality disorder represents mild schizophrenia. The disorder is characterized by odd forms of thinking and perceiving, and individuals with this disorder often seek isolation from others. They sometimes believe to have extra sensory ability or that unrelated events relate to them in some important way. They generally engage in eccentric behavior and have difficulty concentrating for long periods of time. Their speech is often over elaborate and difficult to follow.
Symptoms of Schizotypal Personality Disorder:
Odd or eccentric mannerisms or appearance
Superstitious or preoccupied with paranormal phenomena
Difficult to follow speech patterns
Feelings of anxiety in social situations
Suspiciousness and paranoia
Odd beliefs or magical thinking
Appears shy, aloof, or withdrawn to others

I carry the badge with pride. :D

Winston
01-15-2008, 06:17 PM
To the contrary, I am EXTREMELY introspective. I am so introspective that people tell me to stop it.


And hookers tell me I'm well hung...
Mama tells me I'm a real dish...
You always talk about how people are telling you this or that, and it's always something positive. I don't buy it. I don't buy that you even associate with people very often offline, nor do I accept that a person's real life persona can be so dramatically different to the one which they consistently present online.
Introspection is not fantasizing that you share traits with infamous dictators and madmen. You're a narcissistic obsessive-compulsive; that's the record which you have created for yourself online and are continuing to fortify with this thread.

Tonight, when you're lying in bed, your mind will be racing with thoughts of hatred for Ixabert and various characters here. You will be constantly telling yourself how favourably you compare to Stalin or Pol Pot and how you got the better of us with your sharp observations; because, well, they are your observations, and there's no better hallmark of quality, is there?
Consider these words tonight when this mental scenario is occurring.

Helena
01-15-2008, 06:18 PM
:rofl: It'd probably be best if I didn't post mine.

Alison
01-15-2008, 06:22 PM
:rofl: It'd probably be best if I didn't post mine.

Aaah, goan, sweetness. :)

Winston
01-15-2008, 06:24 PM
Jesus. Can I take that again?!

Paranoid: Moderate
Schizoid: Moderate
Schizotypal: Very High
Antisocial: Low
Borderline: Moderate
Histrionic: High
Narcissistic: High
Avoidant: High
Dependent: High
Obsessive-Compulsive: High

Kane, you have to be honest and self-aware to get anything like an accurate result from these tests. Any test which gives you a low rating on obsessive-compulsive and doesn't give you a 'very high' for narcissism is either garbage or you have clicked boxes dishonestly.

Helena
01-15-2008, 06:24 PM
I dunno...:shock:

Paranoid: Low
Schizoid: Low
Schizotypal: Low
Antisocial: Low
Borderline: Very High
Histrionic: Moderate
Narcissistic: Low
Avoidant: Moderate
Dependent: Moderate
Obsessive-Compulsive: Low

Alison
01-15-2008, 06:26 PM
Heh! that wasn't bad. :)

Helena
01-15-2008, 06:27 PM
I gotta say Winston's made me feel better. :D

Alison
01-15-2008, 06:28 PM
Yeah. Good on you.

Anarch
01-15-2008, 06:34 PM
I should like to be psychoanalysed :rockout:

il ragno
01-15-2008, 07:19 PM
Paranoid: How did you get this number? Was it.... Them?
Schizoid: Yes - yes, of course it was Them. It's always been Them.
Schizotypal: Well, I don't care what YOU think anyway
Antisocial: Nothing but assholes everywhere you look. Fuck em all but six, that's what I always say
Borderline: Ahhh, don't mind me, I'm just in one of my periodic suicidal depressions again.
Histrionic: But one day I'll do it! So help me God, I'll end this torture and kill myself! You wait!
Narcissistic: And then what will the world do?
Avoidant: Well, best not to think about it, I suppose.
Dependent: After all, you still like me, right? You do, right?
Obsessive-Compulsive: Wait a minute - this ain't my lucky coffee-mug! Now I gotta do my whole rant all over again from the beginning!

Mandalore
01-15-2008, 07:48 PM
Jesus.
My test score is probably enough to get me commited.

Alison
01-15-2008, 07:49 PM
Yes yes, we all kneew that and don't need to see the results. :D

Phantasm
01-15-2008, 08:13 PM
Jesus.
My test score is probably enough to get me commited.

Another reason that we use pseudonyms!

:lmao:

MrLiar
01-15-2008, 08:33 PM
Pasdaran - Ignorant cunt

Sudaev - Little boy syndrome cunt

Zed - alright cunt

masty - nutty cunt

Lenny p- whining cunt

Pasdaran - double cunt

:tard::tard:

starr
01-15-2008, 08:36 PM
http://www.4degreez.com/misc/personality_disorder_test.mv

My Profile: :lmao:


Paranoid: Very High
Schizoid: Moderate
Schizotypal: Low
Antisocial: High
Borderline: Low
Histrionic: Moderate
Narcissistic: Very High
Avoidant: Low
Dependent: Low
Obsessive-Compulsive: High

It looks like we have very similar issues.:rockout:

Phantasm
01-15-2008, 08:56 PM
It looks like we have very similar issues.:rockout:

I noticed that.

But why was your Obsessive-Compulsive rating low?

:p

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-15-2008, 09:29 PM
And hookers tell me I'm well hung...
Mama tells me I'm a real dish...
You always talk about how people are telling you this or that, and it's always something positive. I don't buy it. I don't buy that you even associate with people very often offline, nor do I accept that a person's real life persona can be so dramatically different to the one which they consistently present online.
Introspection is not fantasizing that you share traits with infamous dictators and madmen. You're a narcissistic obsessive-compulsive; that's the record which you have created for yourself online and are continuing to fortify with this thread.

Tonight, when you're lying in bed, your mind will be racing with thoughts of hatred for Ixabert and various characters here. You will be constantly telling yourself how favourably you compare to Stalin or Pol Pot and how you got the better of us with your sharp observations; because, well, they are your observations, and there's no better hallmark of quality, is there?
Consider these words tonight when this mental scenario is occurring.
You phorians are the ones who bitched about me for being introspective :
"Why won't kane stop talking about himself."
etc,etc,etc.

Anyone who can't see I'm introspective is an idiot. it's the equivalent of not being able to see that Kareem Abdul-Jabbar is black and tall. It's denying things that are so pathetically obvious that you look like an ass for doing it.

Winston
01-15-2008, 11:57 PM
You phorians are the ones who bitched about me for being introspective :
"Why won't kane stop talking about himself."
etc,etc,etc.

Anyone who can't see I'm introspective is an idiot. it's the equivalent of not being able to see that Kareem Abdul-Jabbar is black and tall. It's denying things that are so pathetically obvious that you look like an ass for doing it.

Making everyone else aware that you have a preposterously distorted image of yourself is not introspection, you smuck [sic].

Which is the most foolish, doubting your Jewishness or questioning your introspection? :lmao:

The Green Man
01-15-2008, 11:58 PM
"Bully" is a slang term from about a century ago, that basically meant "cool." Theodore Roosevelt used to use it a lot. NOBODY is "bully," anymore.
If I ever achieved something as a child (e.g. most improved T-ball player) my great aunt would say "bully for you". This phrase was also used sarcastically if someone was boasting in an unseemly manner: "I just got a pay rise.. YEEEEEEAH NIGGAZ!!!"... "well bully for you!".

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-16-2008, 12:03 AM
Making everyone else aware that you have a preposterously distorted image of yourself is not introspection, you smuck [sic].

Which is the most foolish, doubting your Jewishness or questioning your introspection? :lmao:
Both are equally stupid. My anger isn't over the fact that I am insecure. My anger is that I have deep-seated hatred for mentally retarded people. When I walk by a retard who is obviously mentally and physically disabled, it pisses me off. I think the same way when I hear stupid comments. Every time I hear something like this doubted, it draws up the same anger I'd get if I walked past the special ed room in some elementary school.

Anyone who analyzes me and has average intelligence can note the deep thinking and thoughtful content in my posts, which progress, and grow over time as do my viewpoints.

O'Zebedee
01-16-2008, 12:21 AM
I hope they're on security alert at college campuses near where you live.

The Green Man
01-16-2008, 12:29 AM
I hope they're on security alert at college campuses near where you live.
I don't think that's necessary. Kane has been observing the adulation that his peers such as Shays and Mazdak have for mass murderers and school shooters such as Cho and the Kolumbine Kidz, and is trying to put on the facade of the brooding misanthropic high-school overman to get attention and approval. Even if Maz & co aren't reading this, he seems to have decided that this is the way to be liked.

Here's a better approach Kane:

My anger isn't over the fact that I am insecure. My anger is that I have deep-seated hatred for people who are cruel to animals. When I walk by someone teasing an animal, it pisses me off. I think the same way when I hear stupid comments, like people who think that humans are so much better than animals. Every time I hear something like this, it draws up the same anger I'd get if I walked past some negroes betting on a dog fight between two newborn puppies. Once I rescued a pair of puppies from some Mexicans who were torturing them for their perverted jollies, and I raised them as if they were my own two sons. One day one of them died and I buried it in my back yard. The other puppy used to sleep by its graveside, like it was keeping a vigil for its dead brother. :(

Anyone who analyzes me and has average intelligence and human empathy can note the deep thinking and thoughtful content in my posts, which progress, and grow over time as do my viewpoints.

il ragno
01-16-2008, 12:59 AM
Nope. Sorry. Retards it was, and retards it stays.

Why just the thought of some Down's-syndrome bastard arrogantly strutting around like the cock-of-the-walk, making idiotic foghorn sounds, drawing attention away from those of us trying to intelligently discuss Chaim Ben-Pesach.....dammit, I'm ready to fuck up a gork here and now.

Winston
01-16-2008, 01:13 AM
Both are equally stupid. My anger isn't over the fact that I am insecure. My anger is that I have deep-seated hatred for mentally retarded people. When I walk by a retard who is obviously mentally and physically disabled, it pisses me off. I think the same way when I hear stupid comments. Every time I hear something like this doubted, it draws up the same anger I'd get if I walked past the special ed room in some elementary school.

Anyone who analyzes me and has average intelligence can note the deep thinking and thoughtful content in my posts, which progress, and grow over time as do my viewpoints.

Those downers with their uniform facial features, they could almost all be related. Notice how they're always smiling? They're laughing at you, you know. They're mocking your moustache. Not one of them believes that you're Jewish.
How dare they.

O'Zebedee
01-16-2008, 01:19 AM
You know that feature that computers have that allows you to set them back to a predetermined earlier date when they start fucking up?

I'm setting mine back to a time before I knew that internet forums existed.

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-16-2008, 01:36 AM
I don't think that's necessary. Kane has been observing the adulation that his peers such as Shays and Mazdak have for mass murderers and school shooters such as Cho and the Kolumbine Kidz, and is trying to put on the facade of the brooding misanthropic high-school overman to get attention and approval. Even if Maz & co aren't reading this, he seems to have decided that this is the way to be liked.

Here's a better approach Kane:
Thanks for the advice.

il ragno
01-16-2008, 01:38 AM
You know that feature that computers have that allows you to set them back to a predetermined earlier date when they start fucking up?

I'm setting mine back to a time before I knew that internet forums existed.

Yeah. Incidentally, that feature? It never works.

88mmFlaK
01-16-2008, 02:19 AM
My anger is that I have deep-seated hatred for mentally retarded people. When I walk by a retard who is obviously mentally and physically disabled, it pisses me off.

OK, time to exercise your introspection skills:

Why be angry at people afflicted with mental retardation/physical handicaps?

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-16-2008, 02:22 AM
OK, time to exercise your introspection skills:

Why be angry at people afflicted with mental retardation/physical handicaps?
Because one time I had sympathy for a guy or relative low intelligence, and tried to help him out, and he ended up turning on me and stealing stuff. A nigger too. He was drug dealing with my money too.

Winston
01-16-2008, 02:58 AM
Because one time I had sympathy for a guy or relative low intelligence, and tried to help him out, and he ended up turning on me and stealing stuff. A nigger too. He was drug dealing with my money too.

Tell me I didn't just read this...

Mike
01-16-2008, 03:11 AM
I move that "stumbler" be involuntarily renamed. Perhaps "asswipe123123". "Stumbler" sounds too much like an alternate nickname for your average, happy-go-lucky S'Inner. You don't want the kudzu kid mucking up that connotation any further.

Tell me I didn't just read this...Silly, Winston. You don't read Kane's posts. You negrep them.

The Green Man
01-16-2008, 03:16 AM
Tell me I didn't just read this...
Yeah I know what you mean. I read it and started laughing out loud, then I read your and Mike's responses and then scrolled back up to it and started laughing again. My laughter started to die down, but then it started up again twice as hard and continued for about 30 seconds. Then I wrote this post.

todd
01-16-2008, 03:55 AM
Start a sub-forum called 'Concentration Camp' and restrict that Jew Kane to posting there.

il ragno
01-16-2008, 03:56 AM
Kane is just going to get worse and worse until he finally has the courage to come out. But as long as he restricts his gayness to watching DVDs of Italian Hercules movies in the dark and surreptitiously touching himself, his frustrated libido will continue to manifest itself in what clinical psychology refers to as "totally stupid craziness".

harjit
01-16-2008, 04:45 AM
Because one time I had sympathy for a guy or relative low intelligence, and tried to help him out, and he ended up turning on me and stealing stuff. A nigger too. He was drug dealing with my money too.

I've always been of two minds regarding Kane:

1. He's the real deal, in which case I mostly find his innocence endearing.

2. It's all an act.

I have to say, this quote is very much pushing me toward number 2.

MANGO!
01-16-2008, 04:47 AM
Because one time I had sympathy for a guy or relative low intelligence, and tried to help him out, and he ended up turning on me and stealing stuff. A nigger too. He was drug dealing with my money too.

Most 'introspectives' who talk about themselves endlessly tend to be boring. However, your experiences with retarded crack niggers & huffing paint might be interesting to read. You could partially fabricate details ą la 'A Million Little Pieces.'

O'Zebedee
01-16-2008, 04:50 AM
Seriously - this is Andy Kaufman, making his conceptual comedy comeback after faking his death.

The Libertine
01-16-2008, 05:01 AM
OK, time to exercise your introspection skills:

Why be angry at people afflicted with mental retardation/physical handicaps?

Because those dirty bastards get the best parking spaces!:mad:

The Green Man
01-16-2008, 05:04 AM
Kane has occasional moments of lucidness, which inevitably get derailed into his obsession with forum wars and political role-playing. Perhaps he's just a late bloomer as far as personality goes. Hopefully somewhere inside him is an overman trying to get out.

MANGO!
01-16-2008, 05:43 AM
Jesus.
My test score is probably enough to get me commited.

Is it worse than mine?:rockout:

Disorder | Rating
Paranoid: High
Schizoid: Very High
Schizotypal: Very High
Antisocial: High
Borderline: Low
Histrionic: Moderate
Narcissistic: Very High
Avoidant: Low
Dependent: Low
Obsessive-Compulsive: High

Paranoid |||||| 30%
Schizoid |||||||||||||||||||| 86%
Schizotypal |||||||||||||||||||| 86%
Antisocial |||||||||||||||||||| 82%
Borderline || 10%
Histrionic |||||||||||| 50%
Narcissistic |||||||||||||||||| 78%
Avoidant |||||||||||||||||| 74%
Dependent |||| 14%
Obsessive-Compulsive |||||||||||||||||||| 90%
http://similarminds.com/cgi-bin/newpd.pl

ZOG
01-16-2008, 05:50 AM
Is it worse than mine?:rockout:

Que "Crazy Bitch" from a strip club soundtrack :D.

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-16-2008, 05:51 AM
Obviously the test is rigged. It gives anti-social disorder to practically everyone who takes it. It also gives paranoia to everyone.

I certainly don't have anti-social personality disorder (after thinking about it) and my paranoia is more just caution than irrationality. I prepare for the worst, and hope for the best. That's not really paranoia.

starr
01-16-2008, 06:04 AM
Here is another one:

http://similarminds.com/personality_disorder.html

My results here were quite a bit different with the exception of the paranoid category:


Paranoid 74%
Schizoid 66%
Schizotypal 46%
Antisocial 42%
Borderline 30%
Histrionic 54%
Narcissistic 30%
Avoidant 38%
Dependent 30%
Obsessive-Compulsive 46%

There is one question off the top of my head that I did not like in the other test. The one that asked if you have EVER done anything that could have put you in jail. If you have ever even as much as smoked a joint in your life or something as silly as that, you would have to answer yes. This will give you points towards the anti social personality disorder. This does not mean you habitually break the law which is the way the question should have been asked for it to make more actually sense with that disorder.

Scryllak
01-16-2008, 06:19 AM
http://nissaninfiniticlub.net/photopost/data/500/44554455normal_Internet-SeriousBusiness.jpg

Helena
01-16-2008, 06:51 AM
Paranoid 62%
Schizoid 42%
Schizotypal 38%
Antisocial 34%
Borderline 82%
Histrionic 50%
Narcissistic 18%
Avoidant 34%
Dependent 34%
Obsessive-Compulsive 38%

leopoldbloom
01-16-2008, 07:07 AM
The main problem with online personality tests is that people will tend not to admit their true tendancies.

Paranoid |||||||||| 34%
Schizoid |||||||||||||||||| 78%
Schizotypal |||||||||||||||| 62%
Antisocial |||||| 30%
Borderline |||||||||| 38%
Histrionic |||||||||| 34%
Narcissistic |||||||||| 34%
Avoidant |||||||||||| 42%
Dependent |||||||||||| 46%
Obsessive-Compulsive |||||||||||| 50%


That read a little like the female Helios ^^


I use contractions in an attempt to avoid that.

Scryllak
01-16-2008, 08:15 AM
Warning: schizoid alert.


Paranoid 26%
Schizoid 86%
Schizotypal 26%
Antisocial 26%
Borderline 38%
Histrionic 30%
Narcissistic 22%
Avoidant 62%
Dependent 30%
Obsessive-Compulsive 38%

Mike
01-16-2008, 08:41 AM
Okay, for the first time ever, all of my psychological traits on some crazy public forum. I am hoping that the Jews will not be able to use these things against me. I just took the two tests I saw on this thread, whose meaning I do not understand. Below, I will give you former test results I do understand.

First the ones I do not understand.

From Similar minds:

Paranoid |||||||||||| 42% 49%
Schizoid |||||||||||||||||| 78% 53%
Schizotypal |||||||||||||||||| 78% 53%
Antisocial |||||||||| 34% 47%
Borderline |||||||||||||||| 66% 47%
Histrionic |||||| 26% 43%
Narcissistic |||||| 30% 41%
Avoidant |||||||||||||| 54% 39%
Dependent |||||||||| 38% 37%
Obsessive-Compulsive |||||||||| 34% 40%

From www.4degreez.com

Paranoid: Low
Schizoid: High
Schizotypal: High
Antisocial: Low
Borderline: Low
Histrionic: Low
Narcissistic: Moderate
Avoidant: High
Dependent: Moderate
Obsessive-Compulsive: Moderate

Now, what I do understand is MBTI and the Enneagram. I am a lifelong INTP on the former, and 5w4 (social subtype) on the latter. If you understand what that means, it's enough said.

Macrobius
01-16-2008, 09:27 AM
One word: Qantas.

Winston
01-16-2008, 02:36 PM
Perhaps I don't need locking up after all.

Paranoid |||||||||||| 42%
Schizoid |||||||||||| 46%
Schizotypal |||||||||||||||| 70%
Antisocial |||||||||||||||| 62%
Borderline |||||||||||| 50%
Histrionic |||||||||||| 42%
Narcissistic |||||||||||||||| 66%
Avoidant |||||| 30%
Dependent |||||||||||||| 58%
Obsessive-Compulsive |||||||||||| 50%

Helena
01-16-2008, 06:38 PM
Winston's results are still the most surprising. He has always struck me as particularily normal.

todd
01-16-2008, 06:48 PM
Paranoid |||||||||| 38%
Schizoid |||||||||||||||| 70%
Schizotypal |||||||||||| 46%
Antisocial |||||||||||| 42%
Borderline |||||||||||||| 54%
Histrionic |||||| 26%
Narcissistic |||||| 30%
Avoidant |||||||||||||| 54%
Dependent |||||||||||| 46%
Obsessive-Compulsive |||||||||||| 46%

Winston
01-16-2008, 07:56 PM
Winston's results are still the most surprising. He has always struck me as particularily normal.

I wouldn't read too much into it. Reality is too nuanced for these tests, and in fact I chose the middle hole for many of them because I wasn't happy with an either/or. Plus most of the averages were around 40-50%.

Thaumiel
01-16-2008, 08:04 PM
Great! I thought I might end up being one of those 'obsessive dependent' types for a moment, but thankfully I'm just an antisocial, schizotypal/schizoid narcissist with only slightly above average paranoia. Not sure what 'avoidant' is, probably nothing.

Paranoid |||||||||||||| 54%
Schizoid |||||||||||||||| 70%
Schizotypal |||||||||||||||| 70%
Antisocial |||||||||||||||| 70%
Borderline |||||||||||| 46%
Histrionic |||||||||||||| 54%
Narcissistic |||||||||||||| 58%
Avoidant |||||||||||||||| 62%
Dependent |||| 14%
Obsessive-Compulsive |||||| 22%

Helena
01-16-2008, 08:09 PM
Your dependent is really low. ^^

Geist
01-16-2008, 08:17 PM
Disorder | Rating
Paranoid: Very High
Schizoid: High
Schizotypal: Very High
Antisocial: High
Borderline: Very High
Histrionic: Very High
Narcissistic: Very High
Avoidant: Very High
Dependent: Very High
Obsessive-Compulsive: High

Alison
01-16-2008, 08:20 PM
Heh! Green man! Herrro, Geist. ;)

Geist
01-16-2008, 08:21 PM
I'm just diappointed I got two high's instead of very-highs. Which means I'll have to work harder on working out which questions don't just require you pick yes to prove you are mad.

Winston
01-16-2008, 08:23 PM
"You think you can dissect me with that blunt little tool?"

Thaumiel
01-16-2008, 08:34 PM
Your dependent is really low. ^^
I don't need nobody, if you let someone too close they'll only hurt you. Like that negro spastic I once had pity on, only to find he had sold my gameboy for crack.

Geist
01-16-2008, 08:40 PM
nigga stole my gameboy!

Aulė
01-16-2008, 09:16 PM
Paranoid: Moderate
Schizoid: High
Schizotypal: Very High
Antisocial: Low
Borderline: Low
Histrionic: Moderate
Narcissistic: Low
Avoidant: High
Dependent: Moderate
Obsessive-Compulsive: Moderate

MrLiar
01-16-2008, 09:53 PM
Pasdaran - Ignorant cunt

Sudaev - Little boy syndrome cunt

Zed - alright cunt

masty - nutty cunt

Lenny p- whining cunt

Pasdaran - double cunt

:tard::tard:

Update, someone pointed out a typo,


Zed is a creepy cunt

Mandalore
01-16-2008, 09:56 PM
Is it worse than mine?:rockout:

Disorder | Rating
Paranoid: High
Schizoid: Very High
Schizotypal: Very High
Antisocial: High
Borderline: Low
Histrionic: Moderate
Narcissistic: Very High
Avoidant: Low
Dependent: Low
Obsessive-Compulsive: High

Paranoid |||||| 30%
Schizoid |||||||||||||||||||| 86%
Schizotypal |||||||||||||||||||| 86%
Antisocial |||||||||||||||||||| 82%
Borderline || 10%
Histrionic |||||||||||| 50%
Narcissistic |||||||||||||||||| 78%
Avoidant |||||||||||||||||| 74%
Dependent |||| 14%
Obsessive-Compulsive |||||||||||||||||||| 90%
http://similarminds.com/cgi-bin/newpd.pl


Pretty close, actually. Real low on schizoid/schizotypal, but I'm apparently more than 3 times as paranoid as you.

One day I'm going to try taking these tests without any drugs in my system.:beerbang:

sugartits
01-16-2008, 11:11 PM
Obviously the test is rigged. It gives anti-social disorder to practically everyone who takes it. It also gives paranoia to everyone.

I certainly don't have anti-social personality disorder (after thinking about it) and my paranoia is more just caution than irrationality. I prepare for the worst, and hope for the best. That's not really paranoia.


Who is in your avatar? He is cute.

And would you describe yourself as a horribly suspicious individual?

sugartits
01-16-2008, 11:12 PM
Disorder | Rating
Paranoid: Very High
Schizoid: High
Schizotypal: Very High
Antisocial: High
Borderline: Very High
Histrionic: Very High
Narcissistic: Very High
Avoidant: Very High
Dependent: Very High
Obsessive-Compulsive: High

that's GANGSTA OG Geist.

sugartits
01-17-2008, 12:09 AM
Both are equally stupid. My anger isn't over the fact that I am insecure. My anger is that I have deep-seated hatred for mentally retarded people. When I walk by a retard who is obviously mentally and physically disabled, it pisses me off. I think the same way when I hear stupid comments. Every time I hear something like this doubted, it draws up the same anger I'd get if I walked past the special ed room in some elementary school.


I doubt your sincerity. This is too humorous. That is why I doubt your sincerity.

Geist
01-17-2008, 01:53 PM
that's GANGSTA OG Geist.

now where my welfare check bitch!

IlluSionS667
01-17-2008, 03:39 PM
Most people who still take this kind of internet forums seriously after spending several hundred hours on them probably have some kind of disorder or they don't have a life. In the second case, it's often a combination with the first.

What exactly those particular disorders are, is quite irrelevant and practically impossible to say without getting to know these people in real life. After all, people aren't always the same people online as they are in real life. Nevertheless, it should be self-evident that many of the staff and senior members of various forums have serious ego issues, but it's definitely not limited to The Phora and Stumble Inn. The Lyceum staff, in fact, was filled with bloated egos.

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-17-2008, 07:10 PM
The person with the worst ego complex was removed from the lyceum staff. Fade is on my good side, but you can probably make the constructive criticism that he is capable of being egotistical. The rest of the staff, myself included, was not egotistical.

Alison
01-17-2008, 07:14 PM
Jammer, but I absolutely hate your av. Who is that???

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-17-2008, 07:15 PM
Gary Ridgway, the Riverman.

Look up him up on google.

apocales
01-17-2008, 07:17 PM
Kane did you let Fade know he is unbanned here?

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-17-2008, 07:18 PM
Fade has vowed never to post here again. I could tell him, but he wouldn't care.

Alison
01-17-2008, 07:24 PM
Gary Ridgway, the Riverman.

Look up him up on google.

What is the point of a forum, FFS, where, if you ask a question, you are directed to google? I thought a forum was about traffic.

Jirre, the next person who tells me to google is going to be ignored forever! SHITSAKES!

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-17-2008, 07:28 PM
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=gary+ridgway+a%26e&hl=en&sitesearch= here are some good videos

Alison
01-17-2008, 07:32 PM
No. that's not good enough. I call myself lazy to do the research, but basically, you ar elazy in not providing the information that I and anyone else, can read, in the first place.

If you have something to say, say it on a forum. Don't direct people to other sites to find the information.

In most cases, they won't. Just POST the information on the site you have started the thread on, or are participating in. Simple.

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-17-2008, 07:34 PM
Gary Ridgway was a missionary serial killer who killed more confirmed victims than any other in american history. His kills were all against prostitutes and runaways, who he hated. He killed people to eliminate them from society and "clean it up." That was his motive.

Alison
01-17-2008, 07:44 PM
Wow, that was easy enough. I thank you. Now, if you had said that before.... :)

Winston
01-17-2008, 08:17 PM
Gary Ridgway was a missionary serial killer who killed more confirmed victims than any other in american history. His kills were all against prostitutes and runaways, who he hated. He killed people to eliminate them from society and "clean it up." That was his motive.

Do you admire him?

Zed
01-18-2008, 03:25 AM
Update, someone pointed out a typo,


Zed is a creepy cunt

Geist has you doing his dirty work for him, eh? What a fool.
Strange insult to use against an honest, straightforward bloke like me, too. It would suit a furtive, underhanded lizard who uses dupes to get his insults posted, though. That means you, Geist. :disagree:

Lenny
01-18-2008, 03:34 AM
Geist has you doing his dirty work for him, eh? What a fool.
Strange insult to use against an honest, straightforward bloke like me, too. It would suit a furtive, underhanded lizard who uses dupes to get his insults posted, though. That means you, Geist. :disagree:Geist is the lowest of the low http://stumbleinn.net/forum/images/icons/icon13.gif

Helena
01-18-2008, 03:39 AM
Geist rules.

ZOG
01-18-2008, 03:44 AM
The word out on the street is that I'm just bully.

I don't get how you're getting labeled a sociopath... you don't have any indicators for it.

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-18-2008, 05:12 AM
Featherston is not a psychopath because he is willing to create and build relationships with a tiny ingroup who he befriends. He is not simulating, he is legitimately building them. He's a sociopath because he's willing to take advantage of anyone who is not part of that ingroup. If you are outside of his little clique, he does not judge by any moral code, he just takes advantage of you no matter what. That is the definition of a sociopath. A psychopath even betrays his own clique.

todd
01-18-2008, 05:19 AM
Berkowitz is a remorseful born-again SOB and you shame us serial killer fans by making him your avatar. Fuckin' poser.

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-18-2008, 05:19 AM
I believe 9/10 "rehabilitated" serial killers are lying. Don't worry, I'll cycle through to the next one in a few days.

todd
01-18-2008, 05:20 AM
Berkowitz and a JUDGE tag-teaming the Holy Bible.

http://www.forgivenforlife.com/db_judge.jpg

todd
01-18-2008, 05:24 AM
I believe 9/10 "rehabilitated" serial killers are lying. Don't worry, I'll cycle through to the next one in a few days.Why has he refused being considered for parole? Why has he apologized to the families of his victims? Why did he sue his lawyer for taking his letters to use for a book about Berkowitz, saying he would only drop the lawsuit if the proceeds went to the families of his victims? Berkowitz is a bitch. You're a bitch.

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-18-2008, 05:25 AM
Dahmer claimed to change his religion too. It's usually bullshit. It's similar to pleading insanity. It's just a move to gain sympathy. I almost guarantee you he doesn't mean a thing he says.

todd
01-18-2008, 05:28 AM
Dahmer claimed to change his religion too. It's usually bullshit. It's similar to pleading insanity. It's just a move to gain sympathy. I almost guarantee you he doesn't mean a thing he says.Are you trying to defend Berkowitz and his betrayal, poser? You are getting yourself into heavy territory and I suggest you back off.

Captain Snuggles
01-18-2008, 05:35 AM
Featherston is not a psychopath because he is willing to create and build relationships with a tiny ingroup who he befriends. He is not simulating, he is legitimately building them. He's a sociopath because he's willing to take advantage of anyone who is not part of that ingroup. If you are outside of his little clique, he does not judge by any moral code, he just takes advantage of you no matter what. That is the definition of a sociopath. A psychopath even betrays his own clique.

I'm going to be serious for a moment. Don't take this as a personal insult. But you need to end your presence on internet forums for your own health, as well as the future health of people living near you. I don't understand why you roam forums with all this baggage. It's a waste of your own time. And the serial killer stuff is just creepy. Even you have to admit, if you can step back and look at yourself objectively, that your recent antics, including this silly thread, is a bit over the top and far from productive. You seem to crave respect from people on these forums, and if you don't get it you lash out, and worse. Find a hobby that doesn't involve the internet for awhile. Spending too much time on anything eventually drives you insane.

todd
01-18-2008, 05:37 AM
I'm going to be serious for a moment. Don't take this as a personal insult. But you need to end your presence on internet forums for your own health, as well as the future health of people living near you. I don't understand why you roam forums with all this baggage. It's a waste of your own time. And the serial killer stuff is just creepy. Even you have to admit, if you can step back and look at yourself objectively, that your recent antics, including this silly thread, is a bit over the top and far from productive. You seem to crave respect from people on these forums, and if you don't get it you lash out, and worse. Find a hobby that doesn't involve the internet for awhile. Spending too much time on anything eventually drives you insane.:lmao:

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-18-2008, 05:40 AM
I believe I am entitled to the right to post on free speech forums, even if it pisses others off. I believe the phora and its satellite communities betrayed me and I have the right to do anything I want to in retaliation.

I have no grievance with stumble inn. If it bans me, I wouldn't care. I haven't invested major effort here, so I wouldn't feel betrayed if I was kicked out. The phora was a difference story. I watched it deteriorate, and its deterioration would eventually lead to my own exclusion.

sugartits
01-18-2008, 05:44 AM
"The line between scientific genius and obsessive fanaticism is a fine one"
-from The Brain That Wouldn't Die

Mike
01-18-2008, 05:46 AM
What Bonnie Prince Billy was trying to say in a very humane way, and what you predictably, summarily ignored, is that you're simply fucked in the head.
I believe I am entitled to the right to post on free speech forums, even if it pisses others off. I believe the phora and its satellite communities betrayed me and I have the right to do anything I want to in retaliation.The Stumble Inn is one of these "satellite communities" I gather? Powers that be, take note.

You have no such right. These forums are not really free speech forums. They are free association forums. No forum can be forced to associate with you that does not want to. You are perhaps amusing to a few people currently, but I am certain that they will tire of you. In the end, you will be run off this forum as you have been run off others. To be entirely charitable to you, you are sick, and need serious professional attention. Seek it.

kane - THE NEXT GENERATION
01-18-2008, 05:49 AM
The phora early on didn't mind me. only after it deteriorated, due to fade leaving, was i disliked. The new deteriorated phora decided to change the way the rules were played, and I have every right to do what I want in return. I had invested a lot of effort and i have the right to protect the investment by seeking revenge.

todd
01-18-2008, 05:52 AM
I have every right to do what I want in return. I had invested a lot of effort and i have the right to protect the investment by seeking revenge.You know what would piss them off and be a good revenge? If you killed yourself on national TV. Like at a sporting event or on the street behind a news anchor talking about health violations at local restaurants.

Edit: killing yourself behind a local news anchor wouldn't be 'national' TV, but you get the point.

Mike
01-18-2008, 05:59 AM
Look, you simply don't fit in with normal people. Get used to it, and go away.

The phora early on didn't mind me. only after it deteriorated, due to fade leaving, was i disliked. The new deteriorated phora decided to change the way the rules were played, and I have every right to do what I want in return. I had invested a lot of effort and i have the right to protect the investment by seeking revenge.

sugartits
01-18-2008, 06:24 AM
You know what would piss them off and be a good revenge? If you killed yourself on national TV. Like at a sporting event or on the street behind a news anchor talking about health violations at local restaurants.

Edit: killing yourself behind a local news anchor wouldn't be 'national' TV, but you get the point.


:disagree:

todd
01-18-2008, 06:33 AM
:disagree::agree:

Blitzed
01-18-2008, 07:15 AM
:agree::lmao:

IlluSionS667
01-18-2008, 02:48 PM
How did this thread suddenly turn into a thread on serial killers?

Anyway, back to the more relevant topics :

The person with the worst ego complex was removed from the lyceum staff. Fade is on my good side, but you can probably make the constructive criticism that he is capable of being egotistical. The rest of the staff, myself included, was not egotistical.

Fade is extremely narcistic and can't deal with constructive criticism. Every forum he's in seems to evolve around his person, seems to collapse whenever he desires and he'll censor anyone he wishes the pettiest reasons you can think of. That goes far beyond mere egotism.

The phora early on didn't mind me. only after it deteriorated, due to fade leaving, was i disliked. The new deteriorated phora decided to change the way the rules were played, and I have every right to do what I want in return. I had invested a lot of effort and i have the right to protect the investment by seeking revenge.

Forum rules are entirely the responsibility of the administration. When there's an administration change, forum rules often change too. Like in real life, it's always a matter of accepting the changes or moving to greener pastures. The other option is whining until you get banned. A grown man should be able to accept that after a while.

I've been banned from or left several forums due to disputes to the administration on the level of discussion, censorship, threads being moved around and/or other reasons. Especially censorship is something I just refuse to accept. The first time this happened (which was at Stormfront), I felt similar to the way you're feeling about The Phora administration, but after beeing banned from or leaving volunarilly from a few other forums I started realising that's just the way things are.

Now, if I ever get banned again, I usually just complain with the forum members whose input I appreciate most in an attempt to make them realise the pettiness of their administration and/or make a public statement at the forum board (with a sockpuppet account if I'm banned). If they remove the public statement, I usually keep making sockpuppet accounts and re-posting my statement until they ban my IP or they disable automatic account creation (like Fade did at OD). After that, I just leave and look for another crappy forum to waste my time until something better comes up.... and I ignore anything that happened at that other forum.

I suggest you do the same. Forget about The Phora, move on, and spend your time on more constructive things than getting back at the administration of some forum with whom you had a dispute. It's simply not worth it. I hope you'll one day realise that, as I did too.

Geist
01-18-2008, 02:54 PM
Geist has you doing his dirty work for him, eh? What a fool.
Strange insult to use against an honest, straightforward bloke like me, too. It would suit a furtive, underhanded lizard who uses dupes to get his insults posted, though. That means you, Geist. :disagree:

Considering I asked him to add it knowing full well it would piss you off I'm not sure how deep you need to read into it.

You may on the hand want to look into how few people would consider you honest. Weird neg-rep campaigns anybody?

Geist
01-18-2008, 02:56 PM
Geist is the lowest of the low http://stumbleinn.net/forum/images/icons/icon13.gif

catholicism

Winston
01-18-2008, 03:56 PM
http://i11.tinypic.com/6s9bel3.jpg

Lenny
01-18-2008, 07:57 PM
Fade is extremely narcistic and can't deal with constructive criticism. Every forum he's in seems to evolve around his person, seems to collapse whenever he desires and he'll censor anyone he wishes the pettiest reasons you can think of. That goes far beyond mere egotism.If this were true, he never would have created and developed the successful Phora forum (now under new management and known by some as The Torah). While not a great administrator (very few are), in my opinion he is better at creating a good forum than any other that I have seen on any of these forums. He was terrible on security, but that's something else entirely.

88mmFlaK
01-18-2008, 08:39 PM
If this were true, he never would have created and developed the successful Phora forum (now under new management and known by some as The Torah). While not a great administrator (very few are), in my opinion he is better at creating a good forum than any other that I have seen on any of these forums. He was terrible on security, but that's something else entirely.

You've got to be kidding. Fraudd de Bitcher can't keep a forum running for more than a few months...besides, phishing his member's passwords and rifling through their PMs amongst other things put him on about the same level as the dreck that runs the One People's Party and actually a step below Bill White.

IlluSionS667
01-18-2008, 10:11 PM
besides, phishing his member's passwords and rifling through their PMs amongst other things put him on about the same level as the dreck that runs the One People's Party and actually a step below Bill White.

Bill White can actually write some decent articles if he wants to. He just screws it up when he opens his mouth.

And yes, it is true that Fade handed over The Phora to other people. It should be obvious be now that he'll regret that for the rest of his life.

I guess Fade expected the new Phora administration could take the load of his back while he could keep running the show and taking credit for it, since that's pretty much what happened at The Lyceum. The Lyceum was officially Daniel Shays's forum, but it had FadeTB written all over it.

88mmFlaK
01-18-2008, 10:31 PM
Bill White can actually write some decent articles if he wants to. He just screws it up when he opens his mind.

And yes, it is true that Fade handed over The Phora to other people. It should be obvious be now that he'll regret that for the rest of his life.

I guess Fade expected the new Phora administration could take the load of his back while he could keep running the show and taking credit for it, since that's pretty much what happened at The Lyceum. The Lyceum was officially Daniel Shays's forum, but it had FadeTB written all over it.

Regret, indeed.

Fade handed ownership of the Phora's small database over to the new owners in Nov. 2005, after a rapid succession of hacks wiped out all the posts each time. After that, he disappeared on one of his sabbaticals, claiming disgust at the internet in general. He came back a few months later to a growing forum, and tried to weasel his way back into ownership of sorts, attempting to give money for a share in the site, and FTP access. It's painfully obvious now that doing so would have been a serious error.

A few days after his attempt to worm his way back to the helm had failed in no uncertain terms, he set up OcD, and somewhere around that time he hard-deleted over 400 of his posts, because Potyid had claimed, in the shoutbox, that Fade cried when Carrigan dumped him. He went all emo on us. :weird:

Zed
01-18-2008, 11:21 PM
Considering I asked him to add it knowing full well it would piss you off I'm not sure how deep you need to read into it.

Posting it yourself would have been honest. It doesn't surprise me in the slightest that this little fact escapes you. You and honesty aren't well known to each other.

You may on the hand want to look into how few people would consider you honest. Weird neg-rep campaigns anybody?


Neg repping a twat like you isn't strange in the slightest. You earned it by being a cunt over on the Phora, deleting whole posts of mine and re-writing some, all the while gloating that an appeal to the admins would be futile. Fuck you.

Alison
01-19-2008, 05:32 PM
Whaaat??? Geist did that?

Zed
01-19-2008, 06:38 PM
Yes. He's earned my contempt quite "honestly". :)

Alison
01-19-2008, 06:53 PM
Hmm, and to think.......

Shit! I'm pissed off now.

IlluSionS667
01-21-2008, 10:28 AM
Fade handed ownership of the Phora's small database over to the new owners in Nov. 2005, after a rapid succession of hacks wiped out all the posts each time. After that, he disappeared on one of his sabbaticals, claiming disgust at the internet in general. He came back a few months later to a growing forum, and tried to weasel his way back into ownership of sorts, attempting to give money for a share in the site, and FTP access. It's painfully obvious now that doing so would have been a serious error.

A few days after his attempt to worm his way back to the helm had failed in no uncertain terms, he set up OcD, and somewhere around that time he hard-deleted over 400 of his posts, because Potyid had claimed, in the shoutbox, that Fade cried when Carrigan dumped him. He went all emo on us. :weird:

That sounds like the Fade I know, alright. I'm glad I finally understand what happened between you guys.

The Green Man
01-21-2008, 10:55 AM
Posting it yourself would have been honest. It doesn't surprise me in the slightest that this little fact escapes you. You and honesty aren't well known to each other.

Neg repping a twat like you isn't strange in the slightest. You earned it by being a cunt over on the Phora, deleting whole posts of mine and re-writing some, all the while gloating that an appeal to the admins would be futile. Fuck you.
What is your username on the Phora?

harjit
03-05-2008, 05:40 PM
Kane is banned?

Does the poor guy ever last anywhere? :(

Mike
03-05-2008, 06:20 PM
Why don't you invite him over your own Mute Stormfront? God knows it could use something to reanimate the corpses over there.

Kane is banned?

Does the poor guy ever last anywhere? :(

harjit
03-05-2008, 06:49 PM
Why don't you invite him over your own Mute Stormfront? God knows it could use something to reanimate the corpses over there.

He was actually there for a while after getting banned from the Phora. He went on an obsessive tear, slamming Phora posters like Starr and Prac. It went out of control and Descendant banned him.

I'm actually not a mod or admin there, and can't reinstate him. Even if someone did, the history would surely repeat itself.

Draco
03-05-2008, 11:22 PM
If I may analyze myself, I am one cool customer. :)

todd
03-05-2008, 11:41 PM
He was actually there for a while after getting banned from the Phora. He went on an obsessive tear, slamming Phora posters like Starr and Prac. It went out of control and Descendant banned him.

I'm actually not a mod or admin there, and can't reinstate him. Even if someone did, the history would surely repeat itself.Kane was almost as annoying as Siciliana.

Lenny
03-07-2008, 01:51 AM
If I may analyze myself, I am one cool customer. :)Sean(doc)Martin was calling you an imbecile a few weeks back :cool:

Draco
03-08-2008, 08:25 PM
Sean(doc)Martin was calling you an imbecile a few weeks back :cool:

Inbred hicks with a pathological lying problem shouldn't throw stones in glass houses.

When someone criticizes me, my response depends on how much respect I have for the person, from a diarrhea squirt like Martin or you, I take no exception to anything that can be said about me, since I must consider the source.

If someone I respect criticizes me, I will take their criticism under advisement.

Hodge Backmaker
11-10-2010, 08:55 AM
Anyone who analyzes me and has average intelligence can note the deep thinking and thoughtful content in my posts, which progress, and grow over time as do my viewpoints.

All these wasted years that pass...

Hodge Backmaker
11-11-2010, 01:03 PM
Subject is a flamboyant baseline figure with strong tragicomic tendencies.

messianic obfuscation: yes
suicidal ideation: yes
aversion therapy outcome: negative
transference susceptibility: high
same-sex orientation: yes
demands narcisisstic supply: yes, curtail as necessary
flight risk: minimal
risk to staff/others: minimal
socialization progress to date: nil
overall therepeutic prognosis: negative