Stumble Inn
 
Stumble Inn

Go Back   Stumble Inn > Dive Bars > The Brick Tavern

View Poll Results: Is guerrilla warfare feminine?
Yes 2 10.53%
No 17 89.47%
Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-06-2009, 08:08 PM
FIPS's Avatar
FIPS FIPS is offline
Forgiving Hitler His imperfections
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Auschwitz Open Pit Grill and BaByQ
Posts: 8,383
FIPS is a good white manFIPS is a good white manFIPS is a good white manFIPS is a good white manFIPS is a good white manFIPS is a good white manFIPS is a good white manFIPS is a good white manFIPS is a good white manFIPS is a good white manFIPS is a good white man

Slavic-Union
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T.J. Harden View Post
Guerrilla warfare includes modern tactics such as predator drones that utilize unmanned flying machines to track down and destroy enemy targets. A real army is one that fights in the open and are complied of men that fight to epic proportions with sword, shield, or revolver. I'm sick of calling guerrillas my heroes. These men are not my heroes--they are guerrillas, sissies, females. When our soldiers are blown up by other guerrillas(girls) with mines, It's sickening to see how low warfare has sunk, the use of killing machines is even less heroic than using a rock to hide behind. In real warfare men would fight man and would find great dishonor of using machines to fight and destroy the land they love. Is it no wonder that the homosexual Leonardo DaVinci invented some of the first killing machines? You let a homosexual build your technology and you end up fighting a feminine style war.
Do you think the Jews cared whether good white men killed them with feminine gas or masculine axes and hammers?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-06-2009, 08:55 PM
6KILLER 6KILLER is offline
Two Wongs made a Wright
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cloud 666
Posts: 3,024
6KILLER resembles an Anglo6KILLER resembles an Anglo6KILLER resembles an Anglo6KILLER resembles an Anglo6KILLER resembles an Anglo6KILLER resembles an Anglo6KILLER resembles an Anglo6KILLER resembles an Anglo6KILLER resembles an Anglo6KILLER resembles an Anglo6KILLER resembles an Anglo

Jolly-Roger
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T.J. Harden View Post
Why am I fighting blacks? I don't even have reason to pick a fight with them. Besides I'm trained in hand to hand combat and can take down any foe if I so wish. Anyway, I never said anything about going unarmed. I clearly said it was alright to fight with swords and even projectile weapons like guns.
Have you had to apply that H2H training to an actual confrontation?




Quote:
Originally Posted by T.J. Harden View Post
I'm Christian, friend. I don't watch Hollywood movies because the great majority of their films are anti-Christian values. Perhaps you should read about the Greek heroes and understand how real men fought.
You've acquired romantical & mythical ideas of ancient Greece that didn't exist.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-06-2009, 09:25 PM
Johnson Johnson is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,478
Johnson is a good white manJohnson is a good white manJohnson is a good white manJohnson is a good white manJohnson is a good white manJohnson is a good white manJohnson is a good white manJohnson is a good white manJohnson is a good white manJohnson is a good white manJohnson is a good white man

Croatia
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mandalore View Post
The group of men who make most efficient use of tactics and technology in the greatest numbers win the war. Always. The end.
Agree, except I'll take it further and suggest that traditional notions of 'honor' have no rightful place in modern warfare. "Don't fire 'til you see the whites of their eyes" is a great quote, but it needs to stay in the pages of a history book. Back when battles didn't even last an hour because lines of men would fire on each other with muskets at point blank, sure, it was honorable to meet almost literally face to face on the field of battle. It ain't like that anymore.

Francis Marion, one of my heroes, was one of the early originators of modern psy-ops. It's not helpful to make sure the enemy sees you out of some lame notion of honor - it's helpful to demoralize the enemy by raiding his supplies and attacking while hidden. If the redcoats hadn't have insisted on wearing, well, red coats and practicing their marching in broad daylight, they'd have had a better chance against the revolutionaries, who utilized primitive camouflage.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-06-2009, 10:05 PM
T.J. Harden's Avatar
T.J. Harden T.J. Harden is offline
Wino
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Age: 30
Posts: 2,405
T.J. Harden is a good white manT.J. Harden is a good white manT.J. Harden is a good white manT.J. Harden is a good white manT.J. Harden is a good white manT.J. Harden is a good white manT.J. Harden is a good white manT.J. Harden is a good white manT.J. Harden is a good white manT.J. Harden is a good white manT.J. Harden is a good white man
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6KILLER
Have you had to apply that H2H training to an actual confrontation?
No. I did a simulation and passed my instructors test with flying colors. I'm confident that I could apply what I learned in a real life situation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnson
Agree, except I'll take it further and suggest that traditional notions of 'honor' have no rightful place in modern warfare. "Don't fire 'til you see the whites of their eyes" is a great quote, but it needs to stay in the pages of a history book. Back when battles didn't even last an hour because lines of men would fire on each other with muskets at point blank, sure, it was honorable to meet almost literally face to face on the field of battle. It ain't like that anymore.
It all ended because the original inhabitants of America refused to fight in the open. The cowardly devils liked to ambush good Christians and shoot them with arrows of malice. Later we used the strategy to fight Britain because we couldn't beat them any other way. Now everyone uses this cowardly form of fighting.


Quote:
Originally Posted by FIPS
Do you think the Jews cared whether good white men killed them with feminine gas or masculine axes and hammers?
No wants to suck poisonous gas into their lungs and be asphyxiated. That depends on how the gas effects the human body of course. You could just inhale poisonous gas and vomit up your organs which would probably also asphyxiate you. Some gases burn the skin and do the same when you inhale it. So it's like burning your insides up and you just die of shock. However, being dismembered alive and chopped into unrecognizable pieces by axes with blades as sharp as a diamonds edge is by far the worse fate.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-06-2009, 10:09 PM
Mandalore's Avatar
Mandalore Mandalore is offline
wannabe hillbilly
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,431
Mandalore is a good white manMandalore is a good white manMandalore is a good white manMandalore is a good white manMandalore is a good white manMandalore is a good white manMandalore is a good white manMandalore is a good white manMandalore is a good white manMandalore is a good white manMandalore is a good white man
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T.J. Harden View Post
Why am I fighting blacks? I don't even have reason to pick a fight with them. Besides I'm trained in hand to hand combat and can take down any foe if I so wish. Anyway, I never said anything about going unarmed. I clearly said it was alright to fight with swords and even projectile weapons like guns.

Why? If we follow your line of reasoning to it's logical pinnacle, we'd conclude that the only time a fight is fair is for two men of the same size and fitness level fight under stringent rules. That only happens in rings, not in the real world.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-06-2009, 10:16 PM
Johnson Johnson is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,478
Johnson is a good white manJohnson is a good white manJohnson is a good white manJohnson is a good white manJohnson is a good white manJohnson is a good white manJohnson is a good white manJohnson is a good white manJohnson is a good white manJohnson is a good white manJohnson is a good white man

Croatia
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T.J. Harden View Post
The cowardly devils liked to ambush good Christians and shoot them with arrows of malice.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-06-2009, 10:24 PM
Ron Hitler-Barassi's Avatar
Ron Hitler-Barassi Ron Hitler-Barassi is offline
All women are scum.
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Nazi Heathens FTW.
Posts: 2,409
Ron Hitler-Barassi is a good white manRon Hitler-Barassi is a good white manRon Hitler-Barassi is a good white manRon Hitler-Barassi is a good white manRon Hitler-Barassi is a good white manRon Hitler-Barassi is a good white manRon Hitler-Barassi is a good white manRon Hitler-Barassi is a good white manRon Hitler-Barassi is a good white manRon Hitler-Barassi is a good white manRon Hitler-Barassi is a good white man

British-Union-of-Fascists
Default LOL

New Stumbleinn wiki entry


Caratacus. Effeminate Guerilla tactician, and progenitor of the British Metrosexual Movement.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-06-2009, 10:25 PM
Mandalore's Avatar
Mandalore Mandalore is offline
wannabe hillbilly
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,431
Mandalore is a good white manMandalore is a good white manMandalore is a good white manMandalore is a good white manMandalore is a good white manMandalore is a good white manMandalore is a good white manMandalore is a good white manMandalore is a good white manMandalore is a good white manMandalore is a good white man
Default

In a perfect world, I would like to see a return to the ages when single combat between two generals could decide a battle's outcome, but that time is long gone. Nobody else is following your idealistic notions of honor, so you have no choice but to be even more treacherous and cunning than your enemy.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-06-2009, 10:26 PM
T.J. Harden's Avatar
T.J. Harden T.J. Harden is offline
Wino
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Age: 30
Posts: 2,405
T.J. Harden is a good white manT.J. Harden is a good white manT.J. Harden is a good white manT.J. Harden is a good white manT.J. Harden is a good white manT.J. Harden is a good white manT.J. Harden is a good white manT.J. Harden is a good white manT.J. Harden is a good white manT.J. Harden is a good white manT.J. Harden is a good white man
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mandalore View Post
Why? If we follow your line of reasoning to it's logical pinnacle, we'd conclude that the only time a fight is fair is for two men of the same size and fitness level fight under stringent rules. That only happens in rings, not in the real world.
I only apply fair to being open and ready to fight. What do they call it when you throw an unexpected punch at an opponent? A sucker punch. They don't call it the honorable punch. What do they call it when you hit someone below the belt? A cheap shot. They don't call it the fair shot. We follow rules in the boxing ring but not rules on the battle field.

I used the Spartans as an example and they were obviously at a disadvantage. I don't understand why you keep coming at me with all this nonsense about people being equal size and everything needing to be equal. I'm just against the use of weapons of mass destruction and people hidden from the field of site.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-06-2009, 10:34 PM
Mandalore's Avatar
Mandalore Mandalore is offline
wannabe hillbilly
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,431
Mandalore is a good white manMandalore is a good white manMandalore is a good white manMandalore is a good white manMandalore is a good white manMandalore is a good white manMandalore is a good white manMandalore is a good white manMandalore is a good white manMandalore is a good white manMandalore is a good white man
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T.J. Harden View Post
I only apply fair to being open and ready to fight. What do they call it when you throw an unexpected punch at an opponent? A sucker punch. They don't call it the honorable punch. What do they call it when you hit someone below the belt? A cheap shot. They don't call it the fair shot. We follow rules in the boxing ring but not rules on the battle field.

I used the Spartans as an example and they were obviously at a disadvantage. I don't understand why you keep coming at me with all this nonsense about people being equal size and everything needing to be equal. I'm just against the use of weapons of mass destruction and people hidden from the field of site.
Sucker-punches and cheap-shots win a lot more fights. Want a good one? Shove your left hand in someone's face and then throw a right knee into the thigh, groin or liver. Or(if they're not really drunk) gently toss them your keys, a pack of cigs, etc.. When they instinctively reach to catch the object, put a boot to the crotch. Put your thumb in their eye, bite their nose/ear,fingers,throat. But most of all... use a weapon.

Punching a nigger is ok. Kicking him with steeltoes is better. Hitting him with a barstool is better yet. Hitting him in the chest with 3 or 4 slugs is the best.

:edit: Just realized You'd use the right hand and LEFT knee to hit the liver. Duh.

Last edited by Mandalore; 06-07-2009 at 02:31 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.